Proposals for ban on dogs off leads in park

aa739973303d81d285e49b2f049da294

Following a number of complaints regarding out of control dogs in the town park, owners may be forced to keep their dogs on leads in specified areas of* The Carrs.

Councillor Rod Menlove, Cabinet member for environmental services, said: "Cheshire East Council is proposing to consult with the public regarding the introduction of Dog Control Orders for The Carrs in Wilmslow that will, if supported, be robustly enforced.

"This follows a number of complaints from residents about the ability of dog owners to curtail their pets' behaviour in a popular public place where children are at play."

If a 28 day public consultation proves favourable to the proposals, Cheshire East Council will enforce the following:

  • Fouling of Land by Dogs Order
  • A Dogs (Specified Maximum) Order (this would specify that one owner be in charge of no more than four dogs)
  • A Dogs on Leads Order
  • A Dogs on Leads by Direction Order (to enforce a dog owner to use a lead)

For those who flout the law it is proposed that there will be a £75 fixed penalty notice with a maximum fine of £1,000.

Councillor Rod Menlove added "Cheshire East Council is committed to improving the environment, and these proposals tackle an issue that residents in the area are clearly concerned about.

"The public should be reassured that if there are any objections received on this matter, it will be referred back to me for further consideration so that all points of view are heard."

*Updated: This article was updated on Monday 30th April.

Cheshire East Council are not proposing to introduce a Dogs on Leads Order for the whole of the park but for the area located adjacent to Chancel Lane and north of the River Bollin, which includes both the playing fields and children's play area.

Sorry for the confusion but the information I received last week was incomplete. The Cabinet Members for Environmental Services and Prosperity are discussing the proposed dog control orders for The Carrs this morning.

Click here for maps to show the proposed areas for Dogs on Leads Order and Dogs on Leads by Direction Order.

Do you think dogs should be kept on leads in The Carrs? Please share your thoughts about the proposed new laws via the comment box below.

Tags:
Cheshire East Council, The Carrs
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Kenneth Williams
Tuesday 24th April 2012 at 4:36 pm
Why ban dogs, the problem is "out of control dogs". If the Carrs is going to be policed, why not just impose fines within the existing fouling laws. Exercising a fit and healthy dog in a wide open green space is one of the greatest pleasures left as more and more pressure is put on our time and Wilmslow's open spaces. Just enforce fouling and antisocial behaviour, don't ban free running, well behaved dogs (and owners).
Joseph Taylor
Tuesday 24th April 2012 at 6:24 pm
This is outrageous. Banning dogs being off the lead is just pure idiotic.
What is the point of The Carrs then?
Here, why don’t the council actually do something useful for once, like sorting out smashed glass!?

This is just bluntly idiotic, dogs need to run around, that’s what The Carrs is known for. For dogs being dogs, and for dog owners to respect what they must and must not do.

Like Kenneth said, just police fouling and antiscocial behaviour.
Keith Harris
Tuesday 24th April 2012 at 8:21 pm
This proposal seems somewhat draconian unless the number of "out of control" dog owners far outweighs the number of sensible owners. I think if however , we are talking out only a few bad apples, then every effort should be made to apprehend the guilty parties and prosecute them. I would go for the £1000 fine too, as £75 these days is unfortunately little more than loose change to some local residents.
Richard Batty
Tuesday 24th April 2012 at 9:39 pm
This comes across as another reactionary solution to a problem of bad dog owners not bad dogs. I hope councillor menlove does take on board the comments already posted and amends the proposal of a dogs on lead policy.

I regularly walk around the carrs with my 2 dogs, one I keep on a lead now he's old and can't hear, and one off the lead that is under control. When around the children's play area I keep both dogs on lead or at heel as the area is for kids to play not dog walking. If these daft suggestions are imposed then I hope alot of people boycott the carrs, at least it would be additional green belt for the "wilmslow vision project" to build on.

Surely a more sensible solution would be to have an area around the kids play area where dog leads are compulsory and this should be rigorously enforced. Also where dogs are out of control, as mentioned aboved, surely existing legislation can provide for these circumstances.

Just out of interest, who is going to pay for this additional enforcement of these new rules? Would limited council budgets be better spent elsewhere?
Simon Robinson
Tuesday 24th April 2012 at 11:19 pm
This is a crazy idea. We walk our dog on the Carrs every day and only a tiny proportion we see could be classified as "out of control".

You may as well say lets ban all children/ young people under 18 from the Carrs unless they are under parental supervision, because a small proportion are hooligans.

I agree with Keith above though that we should have stiff fines for those few owners who can't control their dogs or don't clean up after them, but please don't ruin it for the vast majority of responsible owners.
John Bowden
Tuesday 24th April 2012 at 11:21 pm
Why shouldn't perfectly well behaved dogs be exercised properly in a good open space? Mine likes nothing more than a good chase with others followed by a dunk in the river - I don't particularly want to join in with that if I have to keep him on a lead!! Surely it will be best to have a dogs on leads rule near to the play area only?

What Councillor Menlove has also failed to realise is that if this rule is implemented, other areas around the town such as Lindow Common will just become over-run.....or is it the plan to ban dogs off leads full-stop?

I'd love to know how this would be policed too. Surely there's not a lot in the council pot for 'Carrs Park Rangers'!
Birgitta Hoffmann
Wednesday 25th April 2012 at 8:54 am
As usual, we have the problem of the bad apples and one of the commentators is right that the behaviour of some of the kids 'off the leash' could be improved too, so for that matter could the behaviour of some of the adults (esp. after a boozy summer picnic). I think Richard Batty's approach of letting the dogs run, when he is not near the children's area has a lot to recommend itself and I know plenty of responsible dog owners who would go along with it.
Unfortunately, small children are easily frightened especially of larger dogs, and there are quite a few dogs, (frequently young and not yet or not enough trained) that will run to 'investigate' children in the new play areas next to the Parish Hall.
Given that there are multiple entrance to the Carrs, could we not just be good neighbours and use the westernmost areas of the Carrs, (where the second car park is, and no children's play facilities) to exercise our dogs and let the children enjoy the area around their climbing frames).

There is one bit of the regulation I would welcome though: the number of dogs controlled by one person. More than four at a time really is not sensible, especially if they are large dogs and off the leash. A Pack of dogs is a frightening experience to human, child and single dog alike.
Simon Worthington
Wednesday 25th April 2012 at 12:20 pm
As usual the dog owners shout the loudest. The Carrs was donated to the people of Wilmslow not their dogs. I have witnessed dogs running free fouling the Carrs several times and when brought to th attention of the person with the dog who have not noticed, as it is difficult to watch two of three dogs at once, they give you a scowl. Many children are obviously scared of large, boisterous dogs as are many adults. Most owners (contentious I know) are ill equiped to look after and train their dogs properly and even know how to behave around them. Just witness those who kiss their dogs and let them lick their faces just after they have been sniffing and licking ***** **** *****. YUK!!
Richard Batty
Wednesday 25th April 2012 at 3:45 pm
In response to Simon W's comments. I think you will find it is the responsible dog owners who are shouting the loudest as we are being tarred with the same brush. The park was donated to the people to be used for recreational activities, dog walking happens to be one of these enjoyed by many people who visit the Carrs.

I understand your frustration with the irresponsible/ arrogant dog walkers that don't clear up after their dogs or keep their dogs under control, and agree that these people should be penalised for their behaviour. There is already legislation in place to deal with this but i've never seen a Dog Warden or Council worker at the Carrs looking for "offenders". So i'm struggling to understand who will inforce these new rules.

Whilst we are on the subject of messing up the Carrs, maybe we could have someone responsible for handing out litter fines for the amount of rubbish that is dropped during hot sunny days around the BBQ area. Or I suggest everyone that uses the Carrs whether it be a Dog Walker, Picnicker, or afternoon drinker respects the facility and cleans up after themselves.
Joe Goode
Wednesday 25th April 2012 at 4:58 pm
This seems like a poorly thought out solution to a problem that is really quite small. If this goes ahead it will simply recreate the problem that caused this, that being, off-lead bans in manchester which drove dog owners from Wythenshawe and other areas to head down to the Carrs. A responsible dog owner is obliged to exercise their dog properly which cannot be done with the dog on a lead. People unable to exercise their dogs properly will be forced to other areas like Lindow Common, Lindow Moss and areas of Styal.

Due to the attitudes of people who don't train their dogs, most of the poorly behaved dogs are only out on nice sunny days and are manic because they are not exercised enough for the rest of the time. If enforcement for this can be afforded then why not just focus on the problem dogs?

The majority of people who use the Carrs know it is a haven for dogs and the majority who complain use the park only a few days a year, on nice days, THE SAME DAYS THE POORLY TRAINED DOGS GO OUT!

On the subject of dogs fouling, why have so many poo bins been removed or left unemptied when over flowing? Puts some bins near the middle bridge and people will be much more likey to clean up after themselves.

My solution would be to extend the fence of the the original play area to encompass the skatepark and new play area, and maybe that side of the footpath all the way to the bridge at black hill. A lot cheaper than wardens I'd imagine and doesn't penalise responsible dog owners.

If Mr Menlove wants to improve the Carrs, how about making our neglected tennis courts usable again?
Simon Worthington
Thursday 26th April 2012 at 9:37 am
Some excellent points made. The amount of rubbish left when the weather is nice and the "sunny day" dogs come out gives food for thought. Also the purchase of entirely unsuitable dogs (dalmations being one breed) by people with little clue of what the dog requires should soon be addressed by relevant authorities.
Hopefully the need for all dogs to be on a leash in The Carrs will not come to pass but while certain dog owners (the small minority) continue to behave as if The Carrs are their own back garden then it will remain a possibilty.
Perhaps our councillors could address the matter of the tennis courts, broken glass, rubbish, dog mess (lack of bins for both), emptying of bins in summer, and other general small scale facilities before they move on to grandiose master plans for our future.
Raymond Acton
Thursday 26th April 2012 at 4:23 pm
Extending the fenced area for children seems attractive.How about considering a large fenced area for off-the-lead dogs? It works in London parks.
Omar Marquez
Friday 27th April 2012 at 9:09 am
I heartily welcome the idea of making dogs on leads mandatory: every Monday-Wed-Friday I run through Styal Mill and then through the Carrs in order to get home. And many, many times I've been chased by dogs off leads, which is unpleasant, not only because often you don't know if the dog will bite you, but also because they often get underfoot and I end up tripping or almost crashing into someone else (i.e. a child for example!) while trying to not run over the dog.

On one occasion (just less than a month ago) I was finally bitten by a dog! The dog left a wound, and the gormless dog owner just made ineffectual noises at the dog, instead of picking it up. (Many of these dog owners that allow their dogs to chase runners just stand there ineffectually telling Fido to not chase the runner, instead of moving their asses to fetch Fido and put the lead on him...)

I don't want to have to kick dogs, but if I see the dog again I will have to do so in order to defend myself, as I don't like being bitten and it was not a pleasant run to have to run the remaining 2 miles back home with a bleeding bite.

We should also enforce the no-fouling law: I often see plastic bags with dog poop in them hung on trees(!), and in some cases it is just due to plain lazy dog owners, and in other cases due to the paucity of empty garbage bins: such a nice park, but it needs more rubbish bins,more regular rubbish collection, and strict enforcement of the no-fouling rules!
Joe Goode
Friday 27th April 2012 at 4:58 pm
That is definatley a horrible thing to happen Omar and my sympathies are with you. Aggression in dogs is a scary thing and should not be tollerated, however, I'd advise not to kick as this could potentially escalate the situation to a full on attack or get you in trouble for hurting the animal. My advice would be to stop running, as this excites dogs, and give a firm "No!" or "Sit" command. This situation does however relate more to the poorly trained dogs and irresponsible owners though because a dog that is trained well should stop chasing you with one command from their owner who should know what their dog is doing at all times and have control however far away the dog is.
Here comes the bit you won't like... You could choose a different route to take your run home, we can't let our dogs off lead safely in other places. The Carrs attracts dog walkers because of it's size and also because it is away from the dangers of roads and other livestock. I can imagine it is a lovely place to jog through but if this is a recurring event and you refuse to stop running when it causes this reaction in the animal, then you are not making efforts to stop it happening either.
Richard Batty
Friday 27th April 2012 at 6:21 pm
Omar, I would like to also offer my my sympathies as this kind of incident should never happen. Personally I would never allow a dog under my control to behave in this manner. As joe has said this is about the untrained owner who doesn't understand their pet and probably has never trained it.

I think a lot of people don't realise what they see in their dog as a play behaviour can be seen as threatening. Ironically, I often get funny looks when i call my dogs to me, as some people seem to interpret this as me calling a dangerous dog back to me. However this is just me being responsible. As a staffie x breed i understand that people may feel threatened if she ran straight to them to throw her stick for her so i make sure she doesn't.

What worries me is that many owners don't realise is that any dog behaviour that makes people feel threatened is a contravention of the dangerous dogs act. As such the owner can be made criminally responsible for the behaviours that you have experienced. I'm cautious for putting the above statement on a public forum as unfortunately under this legislation it is usually the dog that comes off worse than the owner.

Please can the council see good sense to forget about these proposals and use the resources they would need to enforce then to enforce current laws and to improve the waste facilities so people have no excuses to litter the Carrs.
Daniel Mark
Saturday 28th April 2012 at 9:21 pm
Every morning I walk round the Carrs with my dog and every morning I'm picking up rubbish. On a Monday morning after a sunny weekend the place looks like a tip.
I recently moved to Wilmslow, I didn't know the area but people had told me that Wilmslow was lovely. So I was surprised that the first thing that struck me was the mess of the park on sunny days, so many people just don't seem to care or respect the free spaces they are given, or think it's the councils job to clean up behind them.

I love the Carrs, I walk there 3-4 times a day every day of the year. I meet the same dog walkers every day and most of them care more about the Carrs than most non dog owning Wilmslow residents. Why? because like me they use it every day, rain or shine, they appreciate it and want to look after it.

Ban the dog walkers and you ban the people who care about the Carrs the most. Shame on you Wilmslow. I'll be moving somewhere else if this goes ahead.
Lisa Reeves
Monday 30th April 2012 at 10:30 am
I have just updated this article.

Cheshire East Council are not proposing to introduce a Dogs on Leads Order for the whole of the park but for the area located adjacent to Chancel Lane and north of the River Bollin, which includes both the playing fields and children’s’ play area. 

Sorry for the confusion but the information I received last week made no mention of the orders being restricted to specific areas. The Cabinet Members for Environmental Services and Prosperity are discussing the proposed dog control orders for The Carrs this morning.

Click here for maps to show the proposed areas for Dogs on Leads Order and Dogs on Leads by Direction Order. http://bit.ly/IzBWPi.
Richard Batty
Monday 30th April 2012 at 10:04 pm
Lisa, thank you for the update. It could be worse, as we had assumed it could have been the whole Carrs. So I'm pleased about that.

However I'm still not sure how they plan to "patrol" this zone and i hope it won't start costing thousands to patrol and sign post. If done properly by local PCSO's or wardens that can also deal with littering, and anti social behaviour, I hope it improves the Carrs for everyone.