Wilmslow Town Council is considering having a new logo created to replace the current coat of arms and provide them with a new identity.
Councillors felt that the coat of arms, which is used to to acknowledge the Town Council's involvement in projects and on banners promoting their events etc, whilst being 'quite a cheerful little thing' with some history behind it it doesn't stand out very well - particularly compared to other logos, such as the Cheshire East Council one.
Speaking at the Town Council meeting on Monday, 16th October, Councillor Frank McCarthy said "Some of us have noted that when the Town Council has become involved in things quite often our town coat of arms is put up there as a representative thing but no-one can actually read it, nobody can actually see it."
He added "The feeling is we should be starting to look at a possible new identity for the Town Council to actually start to get over considerably more to people what the Town Council does."
Nothing is being proposed at this stage but it was agreed that members will start looking into having a new logo designed and come back to the full Town Council with some proposals.
Comments
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.
My message then is keep the logo refresh simple and inexpensive and keep up your excellent work to stop Wilmslow being overdeveloped in the hands of Cheshire East. Thank you WTC !
The arms of Wilmslow are an amazingly fine example of heraldry at its best: simple, visually impressive and recognisable, and, in its full form, distinctively English. It is quite recent (1951) but by being a part of the heraldic "network of symbols", appears tied both to the multisecular national traditions, and to the everlasting human values. To reject such a symbol is to destroy a treasure.
What seems to be forgotten here is that there is no standard visualisation of the arms. The image from the 1951 grant is but an option; other styles may be used simultaneously. Moreover, no one obliges the town to keep using the full armorial insignia in the complete form. The use of the bears' head, the helmet, the mantling, and the motto are optional as well. A human being looks different in different situations without losing oneself, and so should a coat of arms. The Council still may try creating a new visualisation[s] of the 1951 coat, and this may be done in an impressive and convincing way. What is necessary for that is goodwill, I would say.