Join the HS2 conversation with Cheshire East

199858a86f076f64bdc5a2c9b7a9b370

Cheshire East Council is urging people to join its conversation on the high-speed rail link HS2.

Since the Government's preferred route was announced, Cheshire East has been analysing what it could mean for the area and has published a variety of information on its website including a detailed breakdown of where the line is proposed to run.

The Council believes it will bring real benefits to Cheshire East, including a high-speed service taking passengers from Crewe to London in 58 minutes with two services each hour and a maintenance depot at Basford sidings at Crewe, creating between 200 and 300 jobs.

But right now, the Council wants to hear what the people think. What are the main benefits and drawbacks to them, their families and businesses?

This will help Cheshire East to represent their views as strongly as possible when the official consultation period on the route is announced by the Government later this year.

Councillor Michael Jones, Leader of Cheshire East Council, said: "Whilst we are delighted the plans will bring a huge economic boost to Cheshire East and the surrounding area, bringing in jobs, investment and stimulating growth, we also understand that some areas will have some serious questions about how it affects them.

"As a Council, our job is to listen to the people and make a case to the Government about how we want them to move forward with the HS2 proposals.

"To do this, we want to hear from everybody, whether it be residents, town and parish councils, businesses or anybody else whom the Department for Transport's HS2 plans could impact upon in some way.

"I expect there to be plenty of feedback, both good and bad. This is understandable and I say to you now, we are listening to you, we will represent you and we will work together to do what is right for Cheshire East as a whole."

To get involved in this conversation, please visit www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/hs2 and fill in our online web form, call 01270 686022 or via email.

Meanwhile, Ian Jordan, HS2 Ltd director for Leeds, Manchester and Heathrow, has indicated that people whose properties face demolition will be given compensation at "fair, unblighted market value".

A consultation on the Exceptional Hardship Scheme (EHS), which aims to provide assistance for those property owners who are potentially more adversely affected by the proposal has begun and will close on April 29, 2013. People can take part by visiting the HS2 website.

Tags:
Cheshire East Council, Hs2
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Pippa Jones
Tuesday 19th February 2013 at 9:25 pm
I travel frequently to London by train and am an enthusiastic advocate of greener transport. However, I have serious concerns about HS2. If anyone had offered me £96 billion to spend on transport, I would not have dreamt up this plan. I would have created a national network of green pathways and cycleways to encourage people to walk and cycle, and to stop the unhealthy "school run" that clogs our roads and makes our children unfit, fixed the potholes in our existing roads and improved the pavements so road and pedestrian users can travel more safely. I would have invested in the existing rail network, particularly cross country services (I can travel quickly and comfortably from Wilmslow to London but if I need to get to Scotland, Newcastle or the west country it is a different story). The evidence for HS2 bringing growth is specious: yes, it will bring jobs while it is being built but once it is built, it is hard to see how it will. There is a risk that the London commuter belt will just expand. The evidence from HS trains in France and Spain is that the already dominant city (Paris, Madrid, London) benefits far more from high speed links than the regional city (Lyon, Seville, Manchester). The modest time savings involved (given business people can work perfectly happily on their laptops on existing trains) means the cost is hard to justify on economic grounds. A HS 103 mile route in Holland cost more than £7bn to build, runs 85% empty and is losing £320,000 a day. Is that worth destroying a sizeable chunk of the Cheshire countryside?