Gypsy site plans refused

8e92a1f872275dd9402153c32cccf85d

Controversial plans to build a a gypsy site on green belt land off Moor Lane have been refused by Cheshire East Council.

The Council received over 600 letters objecting to the proposal to change the use of the 0.46 hectare of open land for the stationing of one mobile home, one touring caravan and a utility/dayroom on hard standing.

Due to the significant local interest in the proposal the Head of Development referred the decision to the Northern Planning Committee who met today. Nearly 100 members of the public attended today's meeting at Macclesfield Town Hall to hear the decision.

Ward councillors Wesley Fitzgerald and Gary Barton both spoke to oppose the application as did local resident Terry Sleigh. Nobody spoke in favour at the meeting.

Cllr Wesley Fitzgerald said "This is a Green Belt site and although exceptional cases can be made for certain types of development a gypsy encampment is definitely not one of them."

Cllr Gary Barton said "The new government has introduced a new localism agenda which we are told seeks to put the views of the public at the core and plans to ensure their views are upheld. With around 700 letters of objection and a very firm objection from Wilmslow Town Council the local community has spoken and government guidance is very clear on this issue."

He added "Inappropriate development is harmful to the Green Belt and should not be approved, except in very special circumstances. Travellers site, temporary or permanent, in the Green Belt are inappropriate development.

"Green Belt boundaries should be altered only in exceptional circumstances. If a local planning authority wishes to make exceptional limited alteration to the defined Green belt boundary to meet a specific, identified need for a traveller site it should do so only through the plan-making process and not in response to a planning application."

Cllr Laura Jeuda voted in favour of the application. She said "I would like to support the application on the grounds it is one unit. When we went on the site visit we couldn't see anything from the road. I think it should be allowed, we should be supporting these people."

Committee members voted by seven votes to one to refuse the application on the grounds that insufficient information has been submitted with the application in order to assess adequately the impact of the proposed development on nature conservation interests. In particular adequate surveys for the existence of water voles, badgers and reptiles were not submitted.

The application was also refused on the grounds that "The proposed development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and results in a loss of openness and encroachment into the countryside. It is not considered that the unmet need for gypsy accommodation in the area and other material considerations advanced by the applicant amount to very special circumstances that would clearly outweigh the identified harm to the Green Belt.

"The proposal is therefore contrary to policies GC1 and DC31 of the Macclesfield Borough Local Plan, the National Planning Policy Framework and planning policy for traveller sites."

Speaking immediately after the meeting, Cllr Gary Barton told me "I am very pleased that Cheshire East Council has made the right decision. The legislation made it very clear but we have to be mindful that this is not the end of the matter, the applicant has the right to appeal so we have to remain vigilant.

"I am very grateful for the overwhelming response the public made. I have never dealt with an application which has had such a strong level of interest and concern. I must have fielded close to 100 phone calls about this application and my answer phone was filled with messages three times."

Share your views about this decision via the comment box below.

Tags:
Cheshire East Council, Planning Applications
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Jane Bradshaw
Wednesday 4th July 2012 at 9:36 pm
A good result today but as Cllr Gary Barton says ' we have to remain vigilant'. The big guns could still come out if an appeal is lodged.

I hope in the mean time they don't move in under the cover of darkness.

This result has been achieved by people working together creating people power. At the risk of singling individuals out, there is to my knowledge one person who has stood out through these last few months. He has been willing to speak up and generally put himself at the fore. To that person on behalf of the community and locality I offer my very grateful thanks.

So the dog walkers, cyclists, families, photographers and bird watchers etc can continue to enjoy the area.
Dave Cash
Thursday 5th July 2012 at 3:05 am
Heed Gary Barton et al, expect an appeal or revised proposal and additional info.
Interesting the applicants did not attend/speak
The application app only failed by 4 votes
Dave wood
Thursday 5th July 2012 at 4:18 pm
First of all, thank you Terry for the best you could have done in 3 mins. .

II am in the process of ensuring our police are aware of the injuctionn on the land, so if there is any further activiity they will they will know what they arew enfocrcing.
Stuart Kinsey
Friday 6th July 2012 at 10:42 am
Excellent news! This shows that local democracy is alive and well. I hope we see similar robust opposition to future applications where the Green Belt around Wilmslow is "threatened".

Please, residents of Wilmslow remain vigilant!
David Probert
Friday 6th July 2012 at 11:20 pm
The problem is that they will be coming back. They will have expected this refusal and planned their strategy accordingly. It's not over yet.
Hilary Pinnock
Tuesday 10th July 2012 at 2:37 pm
Shame on you Cllr Laura Jeuda. In your official capacity as a councillor, you should be supporting the views of your electorate.
Dave wood
Monday 16th July 2012 at 11:23 am
Cllr Jeuda shows her complete lack of knowledge, she claims that on her site visit nothing could be seen. Councillor this is because the whole site is inundated with japanese Knotweed which is the pretty green screening. Before anything can happen on the site this will have to be cleared.
David Probert
Monday 16th July 2012 at 11:41 am
Surely the obvious democratic way to respond to a Councillor who ignores the strongly expressed sentiments of her electorate regarding this highly controversial Planning Application is to ensure that the residents of her Ward are made fully aware of her decision and that they are encouraged to vote her out of office at the earliest opportunity?

In the meantime Councillor Jeuda should be left in no doubt as to the strength of feeling aroused among her constituents by her seemingly capricious decision to support this totally inappropriate application for a Gypsy site in Green Belt.
Tom Mather
Tuesday 17th July 2012 at 11:01 pm
Great news but who is it that actually votes..Let local residents vote not some big wig that way it would have been a 100% NO !!
Dave wood
Saturday 21st July 2012 at 12:27 pm
There is already someone doing some kind of survey on the land in question. Watch this space.