Controversial plans for crossing and one-way system scrapped

knutsfordroad

Controversial proposals to change the current layout of the road system in the Knutsford Road area have been scrapped by Cheshire East Council.

Having met with the management team and PTA at Lindow Community Primary School, who raised concerns over the safety of children attending the school, Cheshire East Highways identified a need for a signal controlled crossing for pedestrians.

They put forward plans for installing a new Puffin crossing, close to the junctions with Church Road, Upcast Lane and Gravel Lane, and introducing a one way system on Church Road from the entrance off Knutsford Road to the junction with St Johns Road. Highways said this was required due to reduced visibility for motorists once the crossing has been built.

They also proposed relocating the bus stop lay-by that is currently on Knutsford Road to Gravel Lane to make way for the new Puffin crossing.

However, the plans were met with opposition from some local business owners, their customers and some residents. As a result a petition containing 493 signatures has been submitted to Cheshire East Council calling for them to abandon the proposals and use any allocated funding to introduce traffic calming measures and improve signage instead.

Wilmslow Town Council also objected to the proposals from Cheshire East Highways because they felt they were not acceptable in their current form and require further consultation.

Having considered the responses to the consultation Cheshire East Council has confirmed that the proposed changes have been abandoned.

Councillor Rod Menlove told wilmslow.co.uk "The responses to the Highways informal consultation show a clear majority against the proposal for a pedestrian crossing and the resultant one way system. The purpose of the consultation was to canvass the opinions of residents and it is good that so many responded. As such, we accept that response as a decision. The proposals have been put to one side and there will be no further consultation."

He added "However, this still leaves the situation of a road that can be dangerous to cross, particularly for pupils at Lindow Primary School, but here are a couple of options worth considering.

"The first is a school crossing patrol for mornings and afternoons. Volunteers are never easy to find but experience elsewhere shows that the best route is to talk to parents or the relatives of parents. This is best done by the school and we would ask that they adopt this as a project.

"The second is to have 20mph morning and afternoon restrictions as is the case in Gravel Lane. Cheshire East has a 3 year roll out programme for such 20mph for all schools in the borough. We will make the case that Lindow deserves a high priority and make every effort to have it installed during this school year."

Graham Hurd, who has run the village store on Knutsford Road with his partner Kate for the past 14 years, started the petition because he was concerned the proposals would affect the future viability of his business by taking away all of their passing trade and inconvenience residents of Church Road, Links Road and Welton Drive because of the increased in traffic from customers and suppliers using the one-way system.

Additionally many residents felt the proposals were ill-conceived and didn't address the real problem of speeding traffic on Knutsford Road.

Graham said "Kate and I are obviously pleased that good sense has prevailed and the Council have scrapped these proposals and we would like to thank all of our customers and the local residents for their support.

"We are as concerned as everyone for the safety of the school children and everyone who needs to cross the road near to our store and we are pleased that the Council are now considering the options of a school crossing patrol and a 20mph speed restriction at times when parents and their children are going to and leaving the school with the aim to implement the measures during this school year.

"However, we still think there is a need to address the issue of deterring drivers who persist in driving at 40-50 mph + through this residential area at all times of the day by installing speed camera warning signs in conjunction with either fixed speed cameras or increased use of mobile speed cameras."

Speaking about the response to the proposals, Zoe Wilson, Headteacher at Lindow Community Primary School, said "We were delighted when Cheshire East councillors attended a recent Governors' meeting to tell us the engineers at the council had investigated the issues and were proposing a plan to fund a Puffin Crossing. However, we understand that, during the recent public consultation about the crossing and the changes that would be made to the local road system, there has been objections and issues raised from within the local community.

"As a school, our primary concern is for the safety of our pupils, but we also recognise and understand the objections that have been raised to the plan. We have been heartened by the many supportive comments from the local community on social media stating that children's safety is of paramount importance.

"We would welcome any further discussion about any crossing solutions that the Highways Team at the council might put forward as an alternative workable option. We sincerely hope that there may be a compromise that would improve the dangerous situation for Lindow pupils, but mitigate the issues and concerns raised by our neighbours and local businesses to the current plan."

Do you agree with the Council's decision to abandon their proposals? WHat, if anything do you think should be done to change the current situation on Knutsford Road? Share your views via the comment box below.

Tags:
Knutsford Road
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Sarah Paterson
Tuesday 4th October 2016 at 5:39 pm
Most sensible folk knew that a crossing patrol and speed control was the obvious way to keep the children safe on their journeys to and from school. How much did that pointless consultation cost? You couldn't make it up!
Roger Bagguley
Tuesday 4th October 2016 at 7:09 pm
No way should CEC simply abandon the issue of safety for all at Davenport Green. The Puffin Crossing with the one way system, with the bus stop moved to Gravel Lane was a nonsense but any money assigned to this should be diverted to traffic calming, not to timed speed restrictions but to physical barriers. The people have expressed a clear desire to improve road safety but insist that common sense prevails. Davenport Green is a village scene we should promote. Within this there is not just the crossing issue at Knutsford Road but the number of parents driving their children to the school down the narrow Upcast Lane. A planning nightmare with this and what is being planned in the emerging Local Plan. However, all problems can be resolved but not by abandoning on the issues.
DELETED ACCOUNT
Wednesday 5th October 2016 at 12:29 pm
Like Alice said, this gets "curiouser and curiouser". First we were told that there had been an "informal consultation" and what the plans were. Then we were told that the plans were the result of "limited consultation" between the School, Cheshire East Councillors and Cheshire East.

Now we are told that the above was not the "consultation" but that the petition etc and the Town Council voicing their views was the "informal consultation", and that as a result there will be "no further consultation".

Meanwhile problems remain to which there has been no formal consultation, but we appear to have two possible outcomes. Am I missing something here?
Vince Chadwick
Thursday 6th October 2016 at 10:04 am
Well, that was a silly little money-wasting detour. Now it's been rightfully ditched, let's not fall back on the unimaginative solution of road humps to reduce speeds on Knutsford Road. These are simply ignored by the 4x4 brigade who don't even notice them, while they damage ordinary cars even if driven over at slow speed.

The obvious solution is speed cameras.

Oh, and can we now have our late lamented bus shelter back, please?
David Kendrick
Friday 7th October 2016 at 7:24 am
How about addressing the issue of idiots abandoning their cars all over the road and pavements when visiting the corner shop?! That's more of a problem than anything else that makes the area dangerous.....