Council Leader issues "rebuttal" to article on staff departures

Cllr Rachel Bailey (1)

Last month I published an article about the Director of Public Health at Cheshire East Council taking voluntary redundancy with a package of nearly £300,000, which includes pension costs to be met from within the Public Health Grant.

As part of a reorganisation, the current post of Director of Public Health, which reports to the Chief Executive, is being replaced with a Director of Public Health which reports to the Director of Adult Social Care and Health which resulted in a drop in salary for the position from £183,328 pa to £86,636 pa.

Dr Heather Grimbaldeston indicated that the new DPH post is not a suitable alternative to the present post, no other suitable alternative roles were available in the Council and as a result she requested to be allowed to leave the Council on voluntary redundancy terms.

Whilst looking for a photo of Dr Heather Grimbaldeston on wilmslow.co.uk I came across an article from April 2013 when Cheshire East Council announced the first wave of appointments to new senior management posts, which replaced the previous structure at the top of the organisation. Amongst the new senior team of 15 managers was Dr Heather Grimbaldeston, appointed as Director of Public Health.

This made me wonder how many of the 15 senior managers were still employed by Cheshire East Council, whether any others had taken voluntary redundancy and the size of their severance packages. I thought this would be in the public interest so I submitted a Freedom of Information request.

On Thursday, 15th September, I published the result of the FOI request and in my normal style I reported the information I had been provided with by Cheshire East Council without comment or opinion. Just before 9pm that evening I received a call from an irate member of the communications team at the Council about this piece. At their request I changed the headline from "Senior management team disbanded at hefty cost", which he said was "very unfair and totally misleading", and offered to publish a statement from CEC as they were keen to "balance the story".

Below is a "rebuttal" from the Leader of Cheshire East Council Rachel Bailey sent for publication on wilmslow.co.uk:

I refer to your on-line article which appeared on Thursday, September 15, 2016. I am disappointed yet again at the negative portrayal of Cheshire East Council for no good cause. You refer to a whole host of staff who have very appropriately moved on in their careers after working for the council over a three year period.

Local government is a fast-moving and dynamic and exciting career and changes over a three year period are not uncommon in large and complex organisations in the public, voluntary and commercial sectors.

Cheshire East Council attracts a high calibre of employees and we are rightly proud of their dedication and commitment and achievements. The Tour of Britain, recently hosted by Cheshire East Council, is a fantastic example of officers getting behind a wonderful initiative to bring a sense of prestige and prosperity to the borough for the benefit of business and residents.

Their hard work and dedication leaves a legacy that will benefit the borough for years to come. But staff who drive and innovate and are ambitious, do sometimes move on and up in their careers. That paired with a redesign of services to deliver better value means that, yes, some managers have taken redundancy options open to them.

In the case of Dr Heather Grimbaldeston, featured in your article as a case study and who received £296k, this figure was largely made up of pension contributions over her long and successful career in the NHS. This was not paid for by Cheshire East Council taxpayers. The actual cost of the voluntary redundancy is met from the money CEC gets directly from NHS England and relate to pension cost entitlements under NHS pension scheme rules.

Dr Grimbaldeston worked for the authority for three years but her service to the people of Cheshire East as DPH covered far longer. She was formerly Director of Public Health with the former Central and Eastern Cheshire Primary Care Trust, prior to joining Cheshire East Council when the public health service was transferred into local councils.

The decision to consider the voluntary redundancy request came as the Council sought to further integrate adult social care and health services under the new strategic director of adult social care and health, within the new 'People' directorate. The new structure will support greater integration, clearer accountability and clearer reporting lines. The revised role will lead public health services within the new structure and will result in a saving of £96,000 per year, together with further savings to be created from a review of the team structure.

Staff have the right to opt for voluntary redundancy, leave their employment for new challenges and change their mind with regard to life priorities. We cannot – nor should we try – to stop this. For anyone who has ever worked for the authority they will know that the Council is a great place to work and Cheshire East is a great place to live and bring up a family. Going into the future, we pride ourselves on this very point. I will defend our valued officers' good name, at all times.

Tags:
Cheshire East Council, Rachel Bailey
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Justin Handby
Monday 19th September 2016 at 8:14 am
If things are so fast paced at CEC then why not employ such high earning managers on fixed term contracts? Say 3yrs or so?
This is just typical of mis-management of public funds, very blasé of the council leader to say its not CEC's mine its from the NHS, still money from taxpayers that should be used on public services, not lining someone's pockets because proper due diligence was not carried out before creating these positions.
Nick Jones
Monday 19th September 2016 at 10:38 am
Existentialism is a great thing!! The Ballot box is another!! … Cllr Bailey may be “disappointed yet again at the negative portrayal of CEC for no good cause”…. Perhaps a bit of general reflection of their compounded mayhem and madness ‘yet again’ is required; Lyme Green, Local Plan, Adlington ‘never build on these fields’ Road, Cllrs going against their electorate voting to build all over the green belt, Co Socious, CEC reorganising into directorates (More Cost!) to become self-funding ?, ‘No need for an inquiry’ £150.000 contracts issued to physiotherapist Core Fit (Now being investigated by Law Enforcement), appointment of a disbarred director , Newly created ‘Executive Directors’ role??.. (Following on from Messrs’ Wenzel, Riley& Suarez) etc…. To then state “ Local government is a fast-moving and dynamic …” Shouldn't they just focus on the electorates expectation of its public servants and be evidencing DYNAMICALLY FAST MOVING substance to what has actually been done to merge East and West ? Get rid of the hypocrisy and start saving our money instead of wasting it.. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck then we have to consider the possibility that it’s a duck…. But if it’s a lame duck ? … (Well ...You decide!)
DELETED ACCOUNT
Monday 19th September 2016 at 11:23 am
I found it very hard to stop laughing at the "rebuttal". "Negative portrayal for no good cause" - what is a "good cause" then? As to "local government is a fast-moving and dynamic and exciting career",- that appears to be because it is hard to hit a moving target. The whole point seems to have been missed, - namely, it is not able people changing their jobs frequently, but who allowed them to have contracts like that + why are they given such huge pay- offs in addition to their generous pension entitlements.

There are many dedicated employees at Cheshire East who attempt to deliver services despite the revolving doors at senior levels.
Pete Taylor
Monday 19th September 2016 at 12:13 pm
Clearly, Cllr. Bailey, the "big fix" announced only three years ago (itself only three years after CEC came into being)
http://bit.ly/2cC3zgm
did not work at all and you are re-organising, yet again, at enormous cost

Is it any wonder that CEC comes if for criticism? The on-going cost of Lyme Green is reportedly over £3m now; the results of the inquiry into it were suppressed to protect the guilty, despite the FOI request from a local newspaper no "unredacted" copy of this report (paid for by the tax-payers) has been seen by anyone, other than CE Councillors.

The former Leader is under Police investigation.

A Cabinet Member did not disclose that he was disqualified from being a Company Director.

The Local plan is years overdue and has become a farce.

CoSocius has cost what? £8m?

The company appointed by CEC to run the bus services went bust.

Every time it rains the roads around Wilmslow flood because the privatised Highways Department has not cleaned out the gullies.
Julian Barlow
Monday 19th September 2016 at 12:15 pm
Another long winded statement from the council designed to confuse facts with waffle. The facts are that the council has demonstrably wasted millions of pounds of tax payers money. "Saving Money" has become a meaningless sound bite rather like "lessons have been learned". These phrases are the local authority versions of pepper spray, designed to be used when confronted with the awkward truth. Ironically both phrases have come to mean the exact opposite of what they imply.
Oliver Romain
Monday 19th September 2016 at 8:16 pm
Staff do not have 'the right to opt for voluntary redundancy' unless they are offered it. Take responsibility for your decisions please.
Graham Jackson
Monday 19th September 2016 at 10:29 pm
The 'People' directorate.... they love their fancy titles in their 'Common Purpose' hideaway in Sandbach.

As for claiming that officers got behind a bike race...well it's just laughable. Is that really the best example of the Council in action when your trying to defend, another PR mess surrounding Senior Management actions - again.

It's about time the local authority ombudsman was called in to look at what is going on in Sandbach.
James MacDonald
Tuesday 20th September 2016 at 11:16 pm
It's like football management, employed to do a job on a very good salary. Receive a leaving package a short time later and most likely hired somewhere else to do it all over again.

In the meantime, the local services diminish each year.
Raymond Acton
Wednesday 21st September 2016 at 4:25 pm
"Well done, CheshireEast! Wonderful!".........tweet received from JLC Grimm and WC Grimm in Germany.
Steve 'Buck' Taylor
Sunday 2nd October 2016 at 6:37 pm
Just reading through the Rachel Baileys rebuttal, our inglorious leader along with the rest of her team need to hang their heads in shame when she comes out with this load of rubbish. Yes if people after three years wish to leave and try pastures new can do so off their own backs. I wonder if the ordinary council worker wants to leave after three years and try pastures new, there will be no enhanced redundancy or backhanded payments for them. Rachel Bailey why don't you go the way your questionable predecessor went and resign. With no enhanced payments or if you did go with a big bung give your proceeds to charity!!