Cyclist punched by irate driver

An 33-year-old cyclist was punched in the face by a motorist following a disagreement on Dean Row Road.

An altercation between the cyclist and the driver of a silver Vauxhall Astra took place at a set of temporary traffic lights around 10.15am on Saturday, 2nd February.

The victim was punched a number of times and received minor injuries to his face.

Police officers are making enquiries and have been interviewing witnesses to the assault.

Anyone with information should contact Wilmslow Police on 101 quoting incident number 307 of 2 February 2013.

Alternatively information can be given anonymously by calling Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

James MacDonald
Tuesday 5th February 2013 at 10:19 am
Hopefully this motorist will be identified and caught and given a custodial sentence
Michael Syddall
Tuesday 5th February 2013 at 1:09 pm
I wonder if the cyclist on Dean Row Road was using the cycle path, most cyclist's don't which causes danger to them and other road users.
Michael Morgan
Tuesday 5th February 2013 at 2:37 pm
Whether or not they were using the cycle path is irrelevant in this case - nobody deserves to be punched in the face! I agree that cyclists should use the cycle paths where necessary - but physical violence is another thing completely!
Rob Sawyer
Tuesday 5th February 2013 at 2:56 pm
There is no obligation on cyclists to use off-road cycle paths. The one along Dean Row Road has its uses (e.g. the school run to Dean Oaks) but entails stopping at several junctions (and dismounting if you obey the signs!). We all have a choice we route we take - the important matter is having consideration for other road users. At lot of on-road cycle lanes suffer from being too narrow or have detritus in them. We don't know the details of this incident but clearly anyone resorting to violence should be brought to book.
Chris Wigley
Tuesday 5th February 2013 at 3:13 pm
Where the cyclist was is irrelevant. The worrying thing is that someone who is so out of control of his emotions and is driving is in charge of a potentially lethal weapon.
David Woolliscroft
Tuesday 5th February 2013 at 6:22 pm
I completely agree with those who say that the motorist should be found and prosecuted. Such criminality cannot be tolerated. We should be encouraging cycling both for health and environmental reasons, and more cycle lanes would be a boon.

At the same time it saddens me to say that there is a significant lawless element amongst Wilmslow's cyclists, some of whom clearly consider themselves above the law, regardless of the danger they cause to others. I tend to walk around town rather than drive, but it is getting to be a rare day when I don't have to jump out of the way of some thug riding illegally on the pavement. Many of them clearly believe that red traffic lights (even at pedestrian crossings) don't apply to them, or that their lives are not worth a set of lamp batteries.

To mention just two events from the last week. On one I was crossing the top of Water Lane. The green man was on for the pedestrian crossing, so both roads had red traffic lights. A cyclist came up from Fulshaw and rather than respect the light rode straight onto the pavement, swept flat out through a crowd of pedestrians and onto Water Lane. On Friday, I was on Grove Street when three yobs (two male, one female) came through at speed in the opposite direction. This is a pedestrian precinct and is very clearly marked at both ends as an area where cycling is prohibited, something which would be obvious anyway. The three looked to be in their mid 20s and were in full high-viz and helmet regalia with expensive looking bicycles, and looked to be very much cycling enthusiasts: who one might expect to have some knowledge of the Highway code. But when some decent citizen challenged them, he was subjected to an abusive reaction that would have shamed a petulant child.

Perhaps it might be time to be even handed between motorists and cyclists by insisting that bikes carry number plates so that they can be identified on CCTV, and reported to the Police by the public when crimes are witnessed. That said, I have also seen in the past (on one of the rare occasions a Police officer has been seen in Wilmslow) an officer wave cheerfully at another cyclist illegally riding on Grove Street and then sweeping at speed into an even more crowded Grove Street Arcade.
James MacDonald
Wednesday 6th February 2013 at 12:16 am
There are lawless cyclists, motorists and pedestrians. If you want to give examples of some idiot cyclists I can give 100s of examples of speeding motorists, driving through red lights, driving whilst using a mobile phone in their hand, failing to signal, faulty headlights, obscured number plates, driving with little visibility due to laziness of clearing snow from the windows, tyres with little tread, no insurance, no tax, no licence, parking on pavements, etc, etc. It is all illegal, failing to adhere to the highway code. However, what is undeniable is that statistically a motorist is much more likely to kill or injure a cyclist or pedestrian than a cyclist would do to a pedestrian or motorist. Furthermore to the use of cycle lanes, they are not compulsory at least not yet. The ones which are painted on a pavement are too dangerous because you get pedestrians wandering aimlessly in them. Also, the DoT state that if you are cycling at 17 mph or above you should use the road. The ones on the road are next to the kerb and generally suffer from a motorist parked in it, flooding, debris, grids, or potholes. PS. If you wanted to report all motoring offences we would need thousands of additional police officers.
Rob Sawyer
Wednesday 6th February 2013 at 10:22 am
James - very well put. We should be wary of categorising people as pedestrians, cyclists or motorists because many of us can be any of the three depending on our journey. The issue is inconsiderate and impatient people who don't believe the rules of the road apply to them - whatever their form of transport.
Derek Stevens
Wednesday 6th February 2013 at 10:25 am
This is a report on two people having an altercation.The report does not give any further details and therefore people should not assume the circumstances.
Vince Chadwick
Wednesday 6th February 2013 at 11:04 am
I'm an active cyclist, motorist,and motorcyclist and I agree with the above - there are numpty road users of every type; cyclists, car drivers, truck drivers, taxi drivers etc. Bad drivers kill, bad cyclists get killed (generally - there are vanishingly rare exceptions). So if there's any 'clamping down' to done, it should be done to the motorised community. Many cyclists are motorists; the converse rarely applies (and by 'cyclists' I mean riding regularly on busy roads, not a Sunday jaunt on Lindow Moss!). So cyclists generally see the car / bike arguments from both sides.

Regarding cycle lanes, my impression of the ones around here is that they are 'box ticking' excercises by the local authority. The painted-on ones in particualr are often of little practical use to cyclists. Next time you see a cyclist not using one, perhaps you should ask yourself why? As others have said, they are frequently full of road detritus, potholes, rubbish from the footpath, broken glass etc. they are parked-in by motor vehicles. But worst of all - they are impractical to use at junctions!

Take the cycle path that starts at the Kings Arms roundabout on Knutsford rd, for instance. Its sole purpose in its short length is to make cyclists take to the footpath, dismount, cross Bedells Lane as pedestians pushing their bikes, re-mount on the pavement, then try to re-join the road traffic. The same applies at any major junction!

If I want to be a pedesrian (and I often do) I leave my bike at home!

Cyclists are very aware of the danger to them of a couple of tons of metal often driven by a less than competant driver hurtling past inches (if they are lucky) from their right handlebar. They don't ride in traffic for the thrill of it, but because there's usually no viable alternative if we wish to continue to use this healthy and carbon-friendly means of transport!
Julia Prestbury
Wednesday 6th February 2013 at 12:29 pm
Couple of years ago I was driving down Manchester Road in Wilmslow and came across a cyclist weaving all over the road. I beeped him to let him know I was there only for him to belt my car roof!!!
Derek Stevens
Wednesday 6th February 2013 at 1:53 pm
Juliia
Thats a bad move as far as a cyclist is concerned. Slow down and give a wide berth is much better and safer way to pass a cyclist.The sound of a car's engine usually does the trick though, unless they are stupid enough to have an ipod in their ears.!
Chris Wigley
Wednesday 6th February 2013 at 6:47 pm
Pedestrians, cyclists and motorists are subject to bad behaviour of each other. Pedestians and cyclists are unlikely to inflict the injuries on others that a car will. What currently worries me is the rise in hands held mobile phones by motorists, a criminal offence which puts all other road users in danger, which does not seem to be being addressed by the police.

With regard to cycle paths, Cheshire East must be fairly high up in having the worse, there is a pedestrian/cycle dual use path running from Summerfields/Dean Row by the A34 bring those on foot and bike into the middle of Wilmslow............its one fault is that it has 81 steps, so if you are pushing a pram, on a mobility scooter, have difficulty climbing or on a bike don't bother using it! Likewise the cycle path at the northern end of The Carrs taking cyclist/pedestians away from Styal Road has 41 steps.
David Woolliscroft
Thursday 7th February 2013 at 12:46 pm
Re: "James - very well put. We should be wary of categorising people as pedestrians, cyclists or motorists because many of us can be any of the three depending on our journey. The issue is inconsiderate and impatient people who don't believe the rules of the road apply to them - whatever their form of transport."


I don't disagree for one moment, and if you actually read my post you will see that. I have no gripe against law abiding cyclist (being married to one), I just don't think we should condone one lot of criminals because there are others.