Cheshire East calls on Government to tackle land-banking

Ainsley Arnold_grey backgr copy

Cheshire East Council has revealed that only 26% of the homes they have granted planning permission for in the past three years have been built.

As a result the authority is to write to ministers and meet with local MPs in a bid to persuade the Government to get developers to deliver housebuilding on land where they already have planning permission - to boost housing supply and relieve the pressure on greenfield sites.

It follows frustration that some developers are 'land-banking' large plots with planning approval for houses and seeking to snap up more greenfield sites – waiting until the market picks up, rather than building homes to meet housing needs. Other sites have seen very slow rates of building completion, for a variety of reasons.

The Council's move follows the Government's announcement this week (January 4) that it will boost housing supply by directly commissioning smaller developers to build 13,000 new homes this year on publicly-owned brownfield land on five sites in the South East – with up to 40 per cent being affordable 'starter' homes.

Councillor Rachel Bailey, Cheshire East Council Cabinet member in charge of the Local Plan, said: "I welcome the announcement of these measures, which will deliver much-needed starter homes around London.

"Nevertheless, I believe we need to turn the spotlight on to volume housebuilders and press them to deliver the homes that they have permission for. For too long now we've heard arguments from housebuilders about a shortage of land to develop on.

"Cheshire East has responded to that argument and granted permission for more than 12,500 homes since 2012, yet only 3,300 homes have been built over this period. It's clear that housebuilders are not delivering the homes that they themselves say there is such demand for.

"The top eight housebuilders, who are responsible for 50 per cent of new homes in the UK, need to be given incentives to build more as they are the companies with the capacity and capability to do so. If they can't or won't, the Government should put measures in place to encourage them or enable smaller housebuilders to fill the gap."

Councillor Ainsley Arnold, Cabinet member in charge of housing and planning, said: "It should not be possible for developers to press for more countryside to be released for housing development when there is clearly a healthy supply of development land. We have to question and challenge the way we deliver homes in the Borough.

"We seem to be locked into a system where the delivery of new homes is largely dictated by a limited number of large housebuilders. The reality is that they largely control the supply of new housing and if they choose not to bring forward sites very quickly there seems to be very little that we can do.

"Government should consider introducing regulations that tie housebuilders to achieving acceptable build rates or, if they do not, lose their planning permissions."

Council Chief Executive Mike Suarez said: "The failure of developers to bring sites forward quickly where planning permission has been granted makes it more difficult for the Council to achieve the required five-year deliverable housing land supply.

"This in turn results in further pressure to release additional unplanned development sites on the edges of our towns and villages – to the frustration of local residents. This cycle creates significant planning pressure without real housing growth which is the worse of all worlds."

Cllr Bailey added: "There seems to be no defence to this argument with Local Plans and Neighbourhood Plans being set aside by planning inspectors in appeal decisions to grant yet more and more sites for housing."

Photo: Councillor Ainsley Arnold, Cabinet member in charge of housing and planning.

Tags:
Cheshire East Council
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Ian Cook
Wednesday 13th January 2016 at 2:46 pm
This is atrocious 3300 houses built when 12,500 have been approved.... seems like just a small alteration to planning consent would solve this problem...
1/ introduce a staged build plan with a minimum of 25% of homes approved being delivered annually over the following 4 years or a financial penalty.
or
2/ CEC implement a £1000 surcharge (for the local parish council?) on each unbuilt home per annum to keep the planning application open, at least then the extra funds could be used locally to improve that immediate areas facilities pre-building.

Hopefully any financial penalty if large enough would push builders along, as sitting on planning for 9000 homes at £1000 x 3 years = £27Million!!!!
Nick Jones
Wednesday 13th January 2016 at 5:56 pm
Make developers pay full council tax 12 months after approval for each house that isn't built..... or in some manner place a punitive 'charge' on the land for the failure to develop ( not easy I know .. just an idea to assist community requirement) ...Although you will need to unravel the holding companies.... and the individuals responsible.So the 'Banked' stock will affect the Local / Regional plan and the balance of requirement , and approved development, needs to be made ahead of any new applications ... I for one wont be holding my breath here .. but it will be interesting to see how verbose our elected representatives get ( or not ) to address this ... 12500 ?? and how many extra houses are supposed to be found year on year ?? This is a gift from heaven for our COGS (Concrete over green spaces) representatives !!.. you'll here more from them shortly !!
Frankly a little concerning... What would Michael do ??
Vic Barlow
Thursday 14th January 2016 at 9:23 pm
It's a scandalous situation for manipulative developers and politicians who have stood by and allowed it to happen.

Who can we trust to represent the voting public with any degree of verve and initiative?

Seems like ALL our politicians are asleep at the wheel.