Green light for residential development on site of former plant nursery

Screenshot 2025-04-17 at 16.48.07

Plans for a residential development on previously developed land in Chorley have been approved.

North East Cheshire Developments have been granted permission for the demolition of existing buildings and structures and the erection of nine detached dwellings each with car ports, front gardens and private rear gardens set around a central 'village green', including a pond. The scheme will provide 5 bungalows and 4 two-storey dwellings, comprising 5-bedroom detached properties.

The site is located within the Green Belt on land to the rear of 72 Knutsford Road. It has historically been used as a plant nursery however the business was closed down in December of 2017. It has since operated as a mixed-use development comprised mainly of light industrial use and equestrian use. It currently accommodates a number of 38 buildings/structures including glass houses, polytunnels, stables and a manège. The applicant proposes to utilise 22 buildings.

Chorley Parish Council supported the scheme stating "We are of the opinion that the proposed development would be a huge improvement on its current appearance and condition and that it would meet the requirements for additional housing."

The Case Officer's report concluded "The site is located within the Green Belt and has been historically used for equestrian purposes and is therefore previously developed land. The redevelopment of the site is acceptable provided there is no greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development.

"The benefits of the scheme also include investment in the local economy and the creation of jobs during the construction phase, increased support for local shops and businesses by the future occupants of the development and the provision of inexpensive market houses in a sustainable location. The scheme would generate Council Tax income, which could provide a source of revenue funding for the Local Authority in delivering services as well as investing in the locality."

The plans can be viewed on the Cheshire East Council website by searching for planning reference 23/2623M.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Pete Wright
Thursday 17th April 2025 at 5:18 pm
It sounds like an upgrade on the existing use and is only a small development but I marvel at the idea a 5 bedroom detached property in south Wilmslow could ever be described as "inexpensive", although the icing on the cake is this gem: "The scheme would generate Council Tax income, which could provide a source of revenue funding for the Local Authority".
More house building all over the place viewed as a positive (by the council rather than residents) because it'll increase council tax revenue. Priceless.
David Nelson
Wednesday 23rd April 2025 at 2:32 pm
Where is it proven that Wilmslow needs "additional housing"? If houses aren't built here, they will build elsewhere. I don't get it.
Brian Hall
Wednesday 23rd April 2025 at 2:52 pm
I agree with Pete Wright. What a splendid piece of male cow poo!!! Wilmslow/Alderley Edge/Chorley are being taken over by these idiotic proposals for houses. Surprisingly they nearlyall get approved. Of course schools, doctors surgeries and public transport will all be taken into ac count as will the road network. These decisions are made by people you voted for but hardly ever see!!!!
John Harries
Wednesday 23rd April 2025 at 4:43 pm
The real danger here is that schemes like an equestrian centre or even commercial gardening historically obtained approval as they were considered complimentary to what we all think of as green belt (similarly golf driving ranges, dog exercise compounds etc.) on otherwise farmland or green belt.
The Case Officer's report concluded "The site is located within the Green Belt and has been historically used for equestrian purposes AND IS THEREFORE PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED LAND".
Where/when was that definition changed or does it now come under the surreptitious introduction of 'grey belt' or as I like to think of it 'the flood gates clause'

Add Your Comment

Share what you think of this story. In order to post a comment click here to sign in or register to become a member (it's free and will only take one minute).