Decision due on plans to redevelop derelict hotel

Plans to demolish the County Hotel and redevelop the site are scheduled to be determined by the Northern Planning Committee next week.

Harden Park Garden Limited has applied to demolish the existing three storey building and erect three residential blocks at the Harden Park site, which lies within within the North Cheshire Green Belt.

The scheme consists of 26 two bedroom apartments along with 64 car parking spaces.

Permission was granted in October 2013 for the demolition of the existing hotel building and redevelopment of the site to provide a residential block of 14 dwellings. Although work commenced on the scheme the developer decided not to complete the project.

The County Hotel has remained vacant since its closure in November 2009, and has subsequently fallen into a severe state of disrepair and has been subject to a number of incidences of vandalism and theft in recent years.

Alderley Edge Parish Council recommended refusal of the original proposal stating "This proposal constitutes significant overdevelopment within the greenbelt. The increased footprint and footage is significant. Ingress and egress from Harden Park will have considerable risk with added pressure from the former "Yesterdays" site, currently being developed, proposed developments on the Royal London site and ever increasing traffic on the A34/Alderley Road. A round about likely won't allow exit and so traffic lights could be the only option. The PC objects to the proposal being a gated complex. The positioning of the entrance directly opposite existing houses compromise their amenity and privacy."

Amended plans were received during the application period, six objections were received prior to the amendments with a further objection received following the re-consultation, which was a repeat of the earlier comment. Some of the issues received include: highway safety issues due to the number of cars proposed; inappropriate development in the Green Belt; over development of the site; underground parking will not be used instead Harden Park will be used; incorrect access position and there are more trees to be lost with this application than the previously approved development.

The planning officer considers the site to be a sustainable location, the development would make effective use of a previously developed site and would improve the appearance of the site which has been vacant for many years and fallen into disrepair.

Additionally, the officer feels that the proposed development does not have a materially greater impact upon the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development or raise any significant highway safety issues.

However, the proposal does not include any on-site affordable housing, for which the planning officer states there is a clear, proven need and commented that there is a lack of information as to the impact of the proposal on the bat roost potential of the trees.

The planning officer concluded that "Together these negatives of the scheme are considered to outweigh any benefits the scheme offers therefore the planning officer is recommending the application for refusal."

In order to meet the Council's Policy on Affordable Housing there is a requirement for 8 dwellings to be provided as affordable dwellings. However, the applicant has stated that they are proposing to use a commuted sum in lieu of on site Affordable Housing provision.

The current number on the Cheshire Homechoice waiting list with Alderley Edge as their first choice is 143.

The report states "This can be broken down to 70x 1 bedroom, 45x 2 bedroom, 23x 3 bedroom and 5x 4 bedroom dwellings, therefore a mix of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom General Needs dwellings and 1 and 2 bedroom Older Persons dwellings on this site would be acceptable. 7 units should be provided as Affordable rent and 3 units as Intermediate tenure."

The planning officer said "The increased number of dwellings with this application over the previous approval also creates an increased need for affordable housing and there are no known sites in the area that would be able to provide the affordable housing provision so to receive a commuted sum would not seem appropriate in this case."

Adding "With this in mind the Council's Housing Officer objects to this application. There is a clear need for Onsite Affordable Housing provision in Alderley Edge."

The plans for the County Hotel site can be viewed on the Cheshire East Council website by searching for planning reference 17/4989M.

The Northern Planning Committee will consider this application at their meeting on Wednesday, 9th May, starting at 10am in Macclesfield Town Hall.

Tags:
County Hotel, Planning Applications
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Sally Hoare
Tuesday 1st May 2018 at 9:19 pm
How can this be “within the green belt”?
It really is time this site was redeveloped, but affordable housing is badly needed.
Gary Chaplin
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 at 5:44 pm
Crazy that the PC are recommending refusal. It's currently an eyesore, dangerous and to develop the site would add so much to the village and the approach to the village. Seems to be proof that the PC have little regard for the village's best interests other than to act as NIMBYs. Every objection cited above is irrelevant, especially now the bypass has eased the congestion it quotes, especially from the RL site.
David Rowntree
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 at 6:15 pm
“Affordable housing” is social housing. Nobody buys them as they are let to people at a subsidised price below the open market price, who qualify for social housing and have declared Alderley Edge as their desired place to live.

Instead of CE concentrating social housing in genuinely more affordable areas, they are spreading this across the county, so nobody has to move areas, regardless of what they can / cannot afford.
Lynne Prescott
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 at 6:55 pm
I agree that this eyesore of a site is way overdue for redevelopment, and that it would be essential to have some social housing rather than a comminuted fund... we are awash with those and they have so many restrictions attached that we never seem able to spend them to actually benefit the local communities the development has impacted. Time to close this loophole for developers