Clamp down on anti-social behaviour as more cyclists take to the roads

Cheshire Police wants cyclists, motorcyclists, horse riders, pedestrians and motorists to share the love rather than frustration on the county's roads.

We are all entitled access to our roads. So With warmer weather hopefully approaching Cheshire Police anticipate an increase in the number of cyclists, motorcyclists, horse-riders and pedestrians across the county's network.

So rather than getting hot under the collar with each other, they want everyone to be considerate, aware, visible and share the road safely with one another.

Nationally there is an increase in the use of bicycles for pleasure and exercise and also to get to work. This trend is being reflected in Cheshire and with the anticipated warmer weather expected to entice more cyclists to take to the roads, Cheshire Police have decided to carry out a four-month education and enforcement operation to promote safety and tackle anti-social behaviour.

Cheshire Police and Crime Commissioner David Keane said: "I'm delighted the Constabulary is taking further steps to use education, and where necessary enforcement, to make our roads a safer place. As Commissioner, I have met with cycling groups who want to ensure safer roads for their members, and heard from many residents about local road safety concerns both from the perspective of a road user and also as members of their local community. What is clear is that there can be frustrations on all sides about the risky and dangerous way some people choose to act on our county's roads. I hope this initiative can make a real difference and helps make people feel safer whether they are cycling, walking, driving or riding."

Superintendent Martin Cleworth said: "We want to make sure we're all using our roads safely and in harmony, so we're going to be out on the road network educating, and if necessary prosecuting those who pose a risk to other road users.

"By educating all users about the safest way to get around our roads, and by prosecuting those who are clearly having no regard for other road users, we can make our roads safer for everyone.

"We've all got a responsibility to look out for other road users and be courteous. Passing too close in a car or by acting defiantly while riding a bicycle, or riding three abreast, there's a chance this could lead to road rage or a serious incident. Think, take a deep breath, and remember the person on the bike, horse, or in the car trying to pass you, is human too."

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Matthew Clarke
Friday 5th May 2017 at 8:29 pm
This article hints at a bias against cyclists. There is a dangerous assumption that cyclists don't have equal rights on the road. They do, and should be given courtesy when driving. Cyclists are not the problem. Superintendent Martin Cleworth seems to share this bias. I'd much rather the police treated all road users with an open mind. For example I have never seen cyclists ride three abreast, yet have seen many examples of cars driving dangerously close to cyclists. One, when it happens, is a nuisance, the other, could lead to a serious injury, which should the police focus on?
Jon Williams
Saturday 6th May 2017 at 11:24 am
completely agree Matthew
Sandra Cox
Saturday 6th May 2017 at 12:05 pm
When dog-walking (so I am not speaking as a frustrated motorist) I have often seen cyclists riding three abreast causing a build up of cars behind them and it is common to see two abreast often riding along chatting to each other oblivious of other road users. I am not against cyclists but it does amaze me that they seem unaware of how vulnerable they are.
DELETED ACCOUNT
Saturday 6th May 2017 at 12:40 pm
I have seen cyclists travelling in a pack occupying one side of a carriageway. I have also seen motorists attempt to overtake cyclists when it is not safe to do so. Lees Lane must be a nightmare for both cyclists and motorists because there is always someone daft enough to attempt the unthinkable on the bends.
Vince Chadwick
Monday 8th May 2017 at 1:21 pm
Matthew Clarke is quite correct, and we have been down this cyclist-bashing route before. Bottom line is, there are bad motorists and there are bad cyclists; no surprise there. However, bad cyclists risk getting killed; bad motorists risk killing someone.

I know where most of the attention of the police should be.
Michael Morgan
Monday 8th May 2017 at 4:41 pm
To be fair, bad cyclists also risk killing someone. I was out walking and was almost run over by a peloton riding far too quickly on a country lane. I totally agree that everyone ought to show the same level of courtesy to all road users and understand the potential risks.
Vince Chadwick
Monday 8th May 2017 at 7:06 pm
Michael Morgan, as a pedestrian your chances of being killed by a bicycle are vanishingly tiny. Your chances of being killed by a car far, however, even while on the footpath, are far more likely.

A quick Google produced this:

# Around 98% of serious or fatal pedestrian injuries in urban areas (i.e. where pedestrians are most likely to be) are due to collisions with motor vehicles.

# The vast majority of vehicle-related pedestrian injuries on the footway/verge involve a motor vehicle, not a cycle: from 2005-14 (GB), 98.5% of pedestrian fatalities and 95.7% of pedestrian serious injuries that happened in collisions on a footway/verge involved a motor vehicle.

# From 2005-14, no pedestrians in Britain were killed by red light jumping cyclists, while around five a year were killed by red light jumping drivers.


Let's keep a sense of proportion here.
Michael Morgan
Wednesday 10th May 2017 at 7:43 am
Thank you for your comment. My main point was that all road users, if acting irresponsible, can cause a serious injury, or fatality, to another road user. Whether a car or a bike is more likely to cause a fatality is beside the point. In the incident I mention above, the bike riders were irresponsible and could have caused a serious injury - this could easily have been a car/another pedestrian/horse riders etc acting irresponsibly etc - the point is taking responsibility and being aware of other road users.
John Featherstone
Thursday 11th May 2017 at 12:29 pm
I was just wondering how much a road fund licence cost for bicycle ?????and how much is a M O T for a bicycle and insurance ?????? yet all these lycra louts have more rights on the roads than the motorist?????? IS THAT FAIR also the people who see these cyclists who ride three and four abreast are correct every Sunday I meet them just drive on a country road and you will see them if you over take them they usual give you the two fingered salute one law for them and another for the people that to use the roads yea I know but the price we pay for petrol ect is taxed to the hilt how much of a cyclist zilch enough said A SAFE MOTORIST
DELETED ACCOUNT
Saturday 13th May 2017 at 12:32 pm
Michael - you are correct - it is about courtesy to all road users. Other half came back via Adlington Road today. This is an "A" road, with a road count point, which takes a high volume of traffic for a suburban area. He witnessed a group or club of cyclists, at least 20, travelling two abreast, but not in a tight formation. A vehicle overtook at the section where overtaking is permitted, but despite this ended up almost colliding head on with a car coming in the opposite direction. As the two vehicles paused to exchange abuse, the cyclists appeared amused. I am registering this comment on this site, because Cheshire East have been warned about the dangers of this road to cyclists, all road users, and to pedestrians because the footpath is so narrow.