Cheshire East Council says neighbourhood plans are going from strength to strength in the borough – with three more recently completed and endorsed by the council.
Councillor Ainsley Arnold, council cabinet member for housing, planning and regeneration, has confirmed the Stapeley, Somerford, Hulme Walfield and Somerford Booths neighbourhood plans following successful referenda. He additionally confirmed that the Bollington Neighbourhood Plan will proceed to a referendum in May.
Handforth and Disley neighbourhood plans are also making good progress and are expected to complete shortly. This will take the total number of completed plans in the borough to 17 – and means that Cheshire East remains in the top five most active authorities for neighbourhood planning in the country.
Many local communities are busy making neighbourhood plans across the borough: Wilmslow, Congleton, Poynton, Knutsford and Calveley have completed their draft plans. Middlewich, Wrenbury, Moston and Newhall are close to publicising draft plans and there are a further 25 communities in the borough working at earlier stages of the process, including Alderley Edge.
Neighbourhood plans contain a number of policies specifically designed to shape local development and safeguard the long-term development of each locality. They can, for example, help delivery of local employment and protection of wildlife and green spaces around their communities, as well as bolster good design and meet the housing needs of local residents.
Sean Hannaby, Cheshire East Council's director of planning and environment, said: "This is fantastic news for plan making in Cheshire East and confirms that our residents have the appetite to help themselves to plan for the future. We've been firmly supporting neighbourhood planning for a number of years now.
"Sound and robust neighbourhood plans allow communities to take greater ownership of planning policy, which directly impacts on their lives. They enable local people to develop policies to address those planning matters that affect not only their interests but also wellbeing.
"Working together across our Local Plan and neighbourhood plans helps us create a development framework, which puts communities at the heart of the planning process. I'm especially pleased to see our first land allocations coming forward through neighbourhood plans at Calveley, Poynton, High Legh and Wrenbury. These give us certainty about what housing will go forward and where it will be, all led by residents.
"With the government's recent confirmation of funding and policy support for neighbourhood planning, we're looking forward to supporting neighbourhood planners across Cheshire East."
Comments
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.
Time after time the residents have been consulted, expressed their opinions clearly and been totally ignored by the Planners.
Time after time, across Cheshire East, Parish and Town Councils have objected to inappropriate developments and been totally ignored by the Planners.
Neighbourhood Plans are a great idea but the fundamental flaw is that they cannot make any changes to the Local Plan; when the Local Plan is rotten, there is a major problem. When the Planning Department seems to be out of control, there is a seriously major problem.
Interesting, so we are told that :-
" Cheshire East remains in the top five most active authorities for neighbourhood planning in the country"
Where I wonder, do they feature on the " Standing up to aggressive developers : listening to residents " scale ?
Martin Kitchin
Summerfields Village Residents Association
There is no great surveillance or understanding of planning by most of the pliable councillors on the planning committees, who have been seen to clearly not understand the remit before them & especially the arguments & concerns by those of residents & respected local bodies.
I could name one SPB councillor who is clearly for all development on the old Macc BC area's green belt, dismissing all arguments in his quest He should not be permitted to sit in judgement with his unashamed bias.
CECs planning culture leaves massive question marks; it requires a wholesale clear-out of that flawed department. In addition, we must have competent councillors on planning committees, who are able & willing to question the officers' recommendations. We have knowledge that some clearly appear to have censored what they may consider to be sensitive policy documentation and representations made by the public so that committees do not see or are aware. More on this issue at a later stage.
"...enable local people to develop policies to address those
planning matters that affect not only their interests but also
wellbeing"
In an true & ideal world we agree wholeheartedly.
However, we can't quite reconcile that when, despite huge opposition flrom 'local people' to protect not only their 'interests' and by keeping fit their 'wellbeing" , Sean's own planning team are supporting the removal (forever) of the Colshaw : Sumnerfields community recreation & leisure facilities.
I am sure it's well intended Sean but in practice and when it actualy means sonething, your statement doesn't quite add up does it ?
Regards
Summerfields Residents Association,