Plans for a watersports and outdoor activity centre at a former quarry have been refused today (Wednesday, 16th November) at the third time of being considered.
Despite having been approved by the Strategic Planning Committee in August, committee members have backtracked with seven members voting against the application and five in favour.
In July the Strategic Planning Committee voted to reject Cheshire Lakes' proposal for a cable wakeboard park, low ropes course, open water swimming, paddle sports, café, water sports shop, showers and changing facilities at the former Mere Farm sand quarry in Chelford.
Members refused the application in line with officer's recommendation because they felt it would have a detrimental impact on biodiversity at the site and in particular on the birdlife as a result of the network of wires associated with the wakeboarding infrastructure.
However, due to an administrative error the application was considered without the applicant or supporters of the proposal being given the opportunity to speak. As a result the decision notice from the Strategic Planning Board meeting on July 27th was not issued and the application was reconsidered at their meeting on August 24th - where members overturned their earlier decision and approved the plans.
Subsequently, Cheshire Lakes' plans for a watersports centre on the North and South lakes of the former Mere Farm Quarry were called back to be heard by the Strategic Planning Committee for the third time, due to concerns that the Council has not fully considered their duties in relation to the wild bird habitat as set out in Regulation 9A of The Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) Regulations 2012.
A spokesman for Cheshire East Council said: "Since the application was resolved to be approved at the previous meeting of the Strategic Planning Board, a further matter has been brought to the council's attention and the planning board has been advised to give the application further consideration."
The planning application was recommended for refusal by the planning officer again, on the grounds that "the proposed development is likely to result in a significant loss of biodiversity".
The planning officer's report, prepared for today's meeting, stated "As part of the application process, the Council's ecologist was a consultee and provided detailed comments and advice, and worked with the applicant to secure the best scenario for the site and for the protection of wild birds in the event that the application be approved contrary to the advice given.
"However, it was made clear through comments made in light of the mitigation proposed, that notwithstanding this, the Local Planning Authority could not comply with the duties set out above and that biodiversity and in particular wild birds would be adversely affected as a result of the proposals."
Tim Woodhead, Managing Director of Cheshire Lakes, said "Our planning application was seen for a third time today and rejected. It had to be seen for a third time due to yet another error from the Cheshire East planning department. We don't want to say too much right now, because we need to take more legal advice on how we will appeal and what we do next.
"There has been amazing public support for our proposals and we feel, along with our professional team of lawyers and planning consultants that errors by the council planning department have not given us a fair hearing. We can assure you, we will be appealing and fighting and will absolutely never give up! Full update coming soon."
Cheshire Lakes were intending to have the site fully operational in Spring 2017, creating 30 jobs, with a new site entrance and parking for 100 vehicles.
The plans can be viewed on the Cheshire East Council website by searching for planning reference 16/1353M.
Comments
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.
Wilmslow and the surrounding area is surrounded by fields, woodland, wetland and has a river. The recent drone footage shown on this website highlighted this fact. Plenty of places for our feathered friends to live, breed and generally enjoy themselves.
This scheme would have brought jobs, health, fitness, sport, friendship, and above all FUN to the people that live in this area. However this has been completely overlooked by council representatives (an interesting word, we are their customers, let's not forget) who from what I have seen, seem obsessed with stamping out anything that their customers actually would like.
Idiotic decision made by a group of people that have lost touch with what their paying customers require.
I do have a theory that many council individuals are anti development, anti prosperity, anti growth, anti private sector because they are predisposed to champion the status quo. It's in their nature!
This water park would have brought pleasure to hundreds and wildlife was also going to be looked after as part of the scheme.
Narrow minded decision makers.
They need to get in touch with reality. How can the same people vote YES and then change to NO sound very fishy to me if you pardon the pun.
this water park will bring many people into the area from all over, local business will do well, as will local hotels and B&B's
As for bio-diversity, the site was originally meadowland before it was gouged apart to industrially excavate minerals!
There are ample alternative habitats within the immediate area for all bird and animal life to find alternate accommodation and with sensitive management the impact on the environment should be absolutely minimal.
Of course as long as there are no street lights to contribute to the carbon footprint ?
Its all a bit daft really isn't it ?? If it wasn't so sad it really would be funny...