Committee makes a u-turn on plans for watersports centre

Members of the Strategic Planning Committee have overturned their earlier decision and approved plans for a water sports and outdoor activity centre in Chelford.

Last month they voted to reject Cheshire Lakes' proposal for a cable wakeboard park, low ropes course, open water swimming, paddle sports, café, watersports shop, showers and changing facilities at the former Mere Farm sand quarry.

The proposal was recommended for refusal by the planning officer because he felt that the biodiversity would suffer as a result of the proposals and in particular the birdlife at the site.

At the Strategic Planning Committee meeting on Wednesday, 27th July, five members voted to refuse the application whilst four voted to approve it and one member abstained.

However, due to an administrative error the application was considered without the applicant or supporters of the proposal being given the opportunity to speak. As a result the decision notice from the Stragetic Planning Board meeting on Wednesday, 27th July, was not issued and the application was reconsidered at their meeting today (24th August).

Tim Woodhead, Managing Director of Cheshire Lakes, explained "Due to a delayed consultation by the council with Manchester Airport, we ended up receiving an objection from Manchester Airport the day before the planning board! Our planning consultants asked the council if we could be withdrawn from the agenda and the Council agreed.

"We had actually not been withdrawn from the planning board and there was an administrative error on the Council's behalf. Our case was actually heard without the applicant or applicant's supports speaking."

Once the Council was informed of the mistake, they apologised for their administrative error and did not issue the decision notice.

The committee were still divided over the proposal on Wednesday, 24th August, with five voting for and five against so the Chairman Harold Davenport had the casting vote. He voted in favour and therefore the application was approved by a single vote.

Tim Woodhead, Managing Director of Cheshire Lakes, commented "We are very happy that Cheshire East granted us planning, the big difference to last month was that a: the Manchester Airport objection was over turned and b: myself and our supports had the opportunity to speak and explain all the amazing benefits of our proposal. We now look forward to delivering an incredible facility which will boost recreation, leisure, sport and tourism in Cheshire East."

Jonathan Vose, Director of Walsingham Planning, said "The Officer's Report acknowledged that the scheme would have huge economic and social benefits, but it was the view of the Council's Ecology Officer that the ecological impacts of the scheme would be 'significant'. We liaised with the Airport, who agreed to remove their objection to the proposals, and submitted an ecological mitigation plan to seek to protect valued species as part of the development scheme.

"Members agreed that the scheme would be a huge asset to Cheshire East, and that the ecological mitigation measures proposed by the Applicant were sufficient to address their concerns."

The scheme, which will create 30 jobs, also includes a new entrance, parking for 100 vehicles and a single-storey multi-use building which will provide a reception, small kitchen; indoor seating; staff office, toilets and changing rooms as well as a kit room and plant room.

The intention is to have the site fully operational in Spring 2017.

The plans can be viewed on the Cheshire East Council website by searching for planning reference 16/1353M.


Tags:
Cheshire Lakes, Planning Applications
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Alison Keeling
Wednesday 24th August 2016 at 2:56 pm
Excellent news!
Terry Roeves
Wednesday 24th August 2016 at 3:26 pm
Training for future Olympic Champions.
An asset of broad appeal. And there will be something for all ages.
We wish the venture every success.
DELETED ACCOUNT
Wednesday 24th August 2016 at 4:44 pm
Whilst this will be popular I suggest that people read the full report and the updates which accompanied the report. Manchester Airport have raised serious concerns and insisted that if Cheshire East approve this application there would need to be stringent planning conditions. You simply have to hope that these conditions are implemented in full and regularly monitored.
Martin Ashcroft
Wednesday 24th August 2016 at 6:43 pm
Some common sense from Cheshire East.
If anyone has visited The Cotswolds, there are a series of gravel pits between Swindon and Cirencester that have been turned into successful leisure parks.
I hope it goes ahead.
Peter Evans
Wednesday 24th August 2016 at 6:59 pm
Great, this does look like sense has prevailed, for once.
I also agree, Jackie, it would be worth reading the full report (I haven't yet), on the face of it I cannot imagine what their objections could be, esp as planes are not meant to fly anywhere near Chelford - I am intruigued!
James MacDonald
Wednesday 24th August 2016 at 11:00 pm
Common sense, it will be a great asset to the local community
Nigel Slater
Thursday 25th August 2016 at 11:38 am
Jackie, I think we should be more concerned about the airports growth and impact on our local environment, compared with a water sports facility which I think will be an excellent addition to the area.
DELETED ACCOUNT
Thursday 25th August 2016 at 12:28 pm
Nigel - I suggest you read the reports. The airport was concerned about bird strikes. The statement put in covered small birds when the real danger is Canada Geese, which are there already, and watersports areas like this attract more of this species. There are special rules governing the zone around major airports. It was this, and its environmental impact on the existing habitat, which is ecologically rich, which had to be weighed in the planning balance. Not surprised it took the deciding vote of the Chairman, because safety was being weighed against popularity and revenue.
Peter Evans
Thursday 25th August 2016 at 2:14 pm
I simply do not understand the bird strike issue - the site for the water park is nowhere near the airport or the flight path. I may be missing something about the flying habits of Canada Geese. Or maybe the airport should insist on and then object to planning permission for bird tables outside houses in Mobberely and Heald Green?
Ryan Dance
Thursday 25th August 2016 at 2:55 pm
Concur peter.

jackie - just admit you don't want the development.

I'm sure Manchester airport won't be overly concerned with bird strikes or ecological diversity.... when they surpass their passenger target of 30 million?

No no.... they will remove all obstacles and your cherished meadows and greenery
DELETED ACCOUNT
Thursday 25th August 2016 at 4:07 pm
Peter and Ryan - seems to me that you are determined to misinterpret what I have written, and that Manchester Airport is somehow making it all up. I suggest, as I did at the beginning, that you read the reports on the website and in the report submitted to the Strategic Planning Board. The airport made their conditions for acceptance very clear.
Anthony Evans
Thursday 25th August 2016 at 5:16 pm
Heathrow Airport is surrounded by flooded gravel pits and reservoirs, whilst The Duke of Northumberlands River and The Longford River flow within the airport boundaries. At Staines, approx 3 miles south west from the airport is the River Thames whilst at Colnbrook, even nearer, is the River Colne. There is also the River Crane on the eastern boundary of Heathrow.
London City Airport is situated on the River Thames whilst Boris Johnson championed an airport in the Thames estuary.
How far is Chelford from Manchester Airport?
Ryan Dance
Thursday 25th August 2016 at 9:24 pm
The report by Manchester airport is a load of tripe.

Jackie. Don't Worry about the water park in Chelford...or indeed the impact on ecological diversity.

Turn your attention to Manchester airport. The plans for the future...airport city...30 million passengers.....before you know it our cosy little green affluent insular village will be a car park.
Graham Jackson
Thursday 25th August 2016 at 9:55 pm
Final approach at Manchester Airport, some few hundred feet, that's lights on and undercarriage down passes directly over Cheadle Royal Business Park. The park is home to several hundred Canada Geese along with other water birds. The site is so busy with wild fowl that it's quite common to have to let these birds cross the road. The aircraft pass so low shadows are cast on the ground. Chelford is miles away and aircraft have gained many hundreds of feet, mainly over Knutsford or Stockport before turning onto their onward bearing. The main bird strike issue comes from Rostherne or Tatton Park not Chelford.
Anthony Harrison
Friday 26th August 2016 at 9:29 pm
Fantastic final result. Utilising an artificial man made lake and strengthening the local economy, this should have been the result in the first instance.
Simon Worthington
Sunday 28th August 2016 at 9:41 am
In agreement again Ryan!!! Manchester Airport has no regard for the residents of Cheshire. When they needed the land for the second runway (to entice BA and their service facilities which didn't happen) Cheshire council rolled over to have their tummies tickled instead of demanding a share and a say in the future. The new "freight village" built on farmland is already causing huge traffic problems. The as yet unfinished bypass, which should have been constructed 20 years ago, may take some of the volume away from Wilmslow as all airport traffic from the east has to pass down country lanes at present. If a small water park some miles away is seen as a threat then let the airport decide how to deal with it. Not our problem.