Lap dancing club refused licence renewal

c9aee60dcfb10cb165245728ead38947

Cheshire East Council has turned down a licence application for the lap dancing club on Grove Street.

The Council has refused to renew the twelve month sexual entertainment venue licence for the ST Lounge, which Van Leisure Ltd has operated in Wilmslow since 2009.

The General Licensing Sub-Committee considered the application by Van Leisure Ltd on Tuesday 9th April, during a meeting which lasted seven hours. However, due to the amount of information they needed to take account of, a decision was not reached until today (Monday, 15th April).

The refusal was made on the grounds that it would be an inappropriate use of the premises given its location on a shopping street like Grove Street, which is used by a wide range of people including children and young people, families and older people.

It was also deemed inappropriate because the location contains a significant number of residential properties in streets adjacent to Grove Street, as well as St Teresa's Catholic Church and Wilmslow Prep School. Other 'sensitive premises' were identified within the vicinity including Wilmslow High School, The Leisure Centre, St Bartholomew's Church, Wilmslow Methodist Church and the United Reformed Church.

The Sub-Committee decided that the ST Lounge had become more prominent during the past 12 months due to the adverse publicity it had received. As a result they were informed that people were now tending to avoid walking past it, particularly in the evenings when they felt uncomfortable but also in the daytime.

The matters which were identified as having added to the raised awareness and concern included: an A-Board with an ambiguous image on it, left outside when the premises were closed, "House rules" flyers found on the pavement outside and the club's website, which has since been taken down.

In August 2012 Wilmslow Town Council made a recommendation to Cheshire East Council that the appropriate number of sexual entertainment venues in this locality should be nil, although Cheshire East Council had not given consideration to such a restriction.

The applicant, their legal representative and two witnesses for the applicant spoke at the General Licensing Sub-Committee meeting on April 9th. They also heard from a number of objectors and their representatives, including a legal representative for Make Wilmslow Matter, a group of local residents who campaigned against the application.

During the 28 day consultation period 390 letters of objection, a petition with approximately 930 signatures and two letters of support were received. There were no police representations.

Van Leisure Ltd had held a sexual entertainment venue licence for a year and a premises licence prior to that. They were forced to reapply for a licence on an annual basis following Cheshire East Council's adoption of Schedule 3 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982 which came into effect on 4th April 2011.

Speaking about the decision, Marion Amir-Hekmat, chairman of Make Wilmslow Matter said "This is brilliant news for Wilmslow and just proves what can be achieved when the whole community works together. The Council are proving to be responsive to the concerns of the Wilmslow community and this decision demonstrates Localism at its best.

"Our many thanks go to the local community and organisations who spent time looking into this important issue, the new law and making informed decisions for themselves. Special thanks must go to the many families, businesses, schools and churches who wrote to Cheshire East.

"Most commented they considered the location of a strip club on Grove Street, near churches, schools and residential areas to be inappropriate in both planning and licensing terms. Wilmslow Town Council and Cheshire East Councillors Barton, Fitzgerald and Menlove have all contributed to this result and we are very grateful for their involvement. This is a great result for the residents of Wilmslow. They make Wilmslow matter!"

Richard Williams, Managing Director from LR Law, who provided legal representation at the seven hour hearing said "The refusal to renew the Sexual Entertainment Venue Licence for ST Lounge on Grove Street in Wilmslow is a victory for common sense – it is quite apparent that Grove Street in not an appropriate location for lap dancing, as it is surrounded by residential areas, parks, leisure centres and churches. Looking at the Council's SEV Policy, you could not pick a worse location for a lap dancing club as it is surrounded by "sensitive" uses.

"The difficulty in opposing the renewal of the lap dancing licence was that the licence was granted in 2012, when the Sub-Committee considered the locality and deemed it to be appropriate. At this year's renewal, residents were fully prepared. They put a considerable amount of work into highlighting the sensitive uses nearby, through surveys, location plans and witness evidence.

"Other than via Judicial Review to the High Court, there is no right of appeal against this decision and the club will now have to stop providing sexual entertainment immediately."

Councillors Gary Barton, Wesley Fitzgerald and Rod Menlove, who spoke out to oppose the renewal of the sexual entertainment licence for the ST Lounge back in February, issued the following statement today.

"We are very pleased that Cheshire East Council's Licensing Committee has refused the renewal of a sexual entertainment license for the ST Lounge on Grove Street. We have said from the start that this is not a moral crusade; it is a case of what is appropriate for our main shopping street.

"As the three Councillors representing Wilmslow town centre, we were united in our belief that Grove Street is a wholly inappropriate location for this kind of establishment. Local opinion was clearly against the application with 390 letters of objection received by the Council and 930 signatures on an accompanying petition.

"We want Wilmslow to have an active and thriving night-time economy. But we also want Wilmslow to be a family friendly environment and a town that remains proud of the active part played in the local community by our churches and schools. This decision supports these ambitions and is good for Wilmslow."

Cllr Louise Brown, of Broken Cross and Upton ward, said "What a fantastic result, congratulations and well done to Marion and the Make Wilmslow Matter group for all their hard work and the working together of the people of Wilmslow to help make the town centre a quality welcoming family friendly place. Thank you to the Council for listening to local concerns."

Unfortunately we have been unable to obtain a comment from Van Leisure Ltd.

Tags:
Licence Applications, Make Wilmslow Matter, ST Lounge
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Sarah Paterson
Monday 15th April 2013 at 8:02 pm
Perhaps I'm being a little naive but how exactly did it adversely affect the church, schools and shoppers? Had to ask!
Sally Hoare
Monday 15th April 2013 at 8:22 pm
That`s what I was thinking, Sarah. I never remember reading of any problems at this establishment. It appeared well run. What has changed since the licence was granted before?
So we`ll have another empty property.
Peter Spencer
Monday 15th April 2013 at 8:22 pm
Got to agree with Sarah Paterson here, how does it effect anything when it doesn't open till about 9PM?

I had lived near Grove street for around 6 months before I even realised what it was, I assumed it was just a closed down bar of some kind.
It doesn't effect me one or way or another as I had never been in there but I find it odd some people could have such a vendetta against it.
Sarah Paterson
Monday 15th April 2013 at 9:35 pm
If there was any evidence to support the suggestions that the club was causing problems in Wilmslow I would fully support the refusal. My concern is that our elected councillors appear to be acting upon assumption. Can we be provided with any examples of harm or damage to the village? Something just doesn't rest easy here.
Dave Cash
Tuesday 16th April 2013 at 4:14 am
When did the ST Lounge degenerate into a sleazy 'strip club', with negative connotations,rather than a previous lal dancing club,in opinion of of objectors?
The ST Lounge may not close, as the alcohol license and opening hours still exist without objection, but if you want the previous licensed sexual entertainment offerred. punters will have to travel 10 miles into Mcr.
Tony Newbolt
Tuesday 16th April 2013 at 7:55 am
I hope the club takes the council to judicial review. As much as it would cost the local people there is something wrong when a club that appears to be well run is shut. I would say to the owners that a club in Leicester took the council to court and won. Also the Thirst Bar in Oxford has started a judicial review and is still trading until the case is settled. I believe the key is the Human Rights Act with reference to enjoying your possessions but would suggest the owners speak to the other clubs.

So Kids are wandering the street when the club is open? Schools and Churches are open when the club is open? Having given a license obviously not an issue but looks like the moral brigade has been active. ST I hope to read about you emptying the council coffers over this.
Vince Chadwick
Tuesday 16th April 2013 at 9:36 am
I have no particular wish to see a sex club in Wilmslow, but this one seems to be well run and I have seen no evidence here or in the local newspaper that it actually causes a problem. I didn't even know it existed until I read about it on this site.

As Tony Newbolt says, the ST Lounge appears to be a victim of the self-appointed Moral Brigade. A correctly-run business is being forced to close, and jobs lost, simply because some people 'don't like it'. What sort of society is it that allows that to happen?

I agree that the ST Lounge should do whatever it can to get this overturned. In fact perhaps the Moral Brigade should target the Catholic Church instead, ironically the local presence of which is cited as a reason to close the ST Lounge, when that church is an organisation with a real history of shame!
Drew Donaldson
Tuesday 16th April 2013 at 10:49 am
Can I add my voice to the throng in support of the ST lounge staying open. I find this decision, not to renew the licence, baffling. Particularly on the grounds quoted. Beware people of Wilmslow!! We appear to have the 21st century equivalent of Mary Whitehouse in our midst. Make Wilmslow Matter? more like Make Wilmslow Madder.... Remember this decision when you vote at the next local election......
Sarah Paterson
Tuesday 16th April 2013 at 12:22 pm
I believe this business was closed solely on decision that a few local people did not approve of the nature of the club. That is so wrong in a free, democratic society. It is only wrong when the people of Wilmslow are forced to tolerate any inappropriate or antisocial behaviour. I would like to see this decision contested and decided in a fair and open process.
Jonathan Hayes
Tuesday 16th April 2013 at 4:08 pm
I quite agree with ALL the comments above. I lived in Bank Place opposite before the club arrived when it was a loud troublesome bar for the under aged. ST was a marked improvement and my wife and I visited it on one occasion just to see what went on. It isn't somewhere I frequented on a regular basis but at least I went and had a look for myself. It was properly run with strict controls inside and out. If these 'Make Wilmslow Matter' brigade get there way the hairdressers will be next to go as I presume the majority will be balding and have no need for them either, maybe the library after that for those with failing eyesight.... and so on. I personally do not go to church or play crown green bowls at the Labour club but I also have no need to have them closed down just because that activity doesn't rock my boat.
If Grove Street is an inappropriate place for such a venue where exactly would be a good one? Maybe on a quite side street next door to a councillor !!!
Brian Hull
Tuesday 16th April 2013 at 7:28 pm
Some of the reasons for refusing the licence may sound tenuous but 390 letters of objection and a petition with over 900 signatures is far from being a "few" objectors. (I was not one of them to put my comments in perspective). This is especially so when you consider the usual apathy about most community issues these days. The reason most people want to live in Wilmslow is because it's a nice place to live and bring up their children. A lap dancing club is not much of an asset to the community in that respect whether or not it was well run. Hopefully it will be replaced with something more beneficial to the town as a whole.
Simon Worthington
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 7:23 am
Quite staggering. I sent an email in support for which I received an acknowledgement from the Council. Would the two others who wrote letters in support come forward. Only TWO? Where did this petition come from and where do the 930 people who signed it live? 390 letters. (390 and 930 - coincidence?) Was a template supplied by the "moral minority"? Many businesses who wrote to Cheshire East? If there are any can they be honest and admit they contributed to closing another business. A councillor from Macc commenting! Just like the one who said she would vote in favour of the gypsy encampment on Moore Lane 10 miles from her patch! The High School in the vicinity? People avoiding walking down Grove street during the day because the bar is there closed? Do me a favour.The list goes on. Surely there is evidence for a judicial review here with the whole process under the spotlight.

Great point Vince. I will give full support to anyone starting a campaign to rid us of a Catholic Church in our midst (along with its considerate parkers on a Sunday morning). Perhaps it could be knocked down with Council connivance and a block of income producing flats built.
Steve Savage
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 10:58 am
Have the Taliban arrived in Wilmslow???
Sarah Paterson
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 11:19 am
I have lived in Wilmslow all my life. I am a mother of a teenage daughter. In no way did the ST Lounge cause an iota of concern! The morality of the club is not the question here. My over riding concern is the ease with which the moralists have been able to rude roughshod over the democratic rights of a business that they have not right to judge on the grounds with which they did. An appeal must be granted here.
Carol Jones
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 11:35 am
Well I think this is a great decision for Wilmslow, Grove Street is not the location for a lap dancing club by any means.I grew up in Wilmslow and worked in Grove Street for four years after leaving the high school,Wilmslow at this time was busy,vibrant with real charm full of wonderful little shops that people needed and used,what a shame it's deteriorated to the point of allowing this kind of establishment in, it really makes me sad.So well done on this decision and let's look forward to seeing Wilmsow edging back to the way I remember it.By the way Wilmsow has a train station you can be in town in 15 minutes if it's lap dancing your after !
Sarah Paterson
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 12:56 pm
Carol, I accept your opinion but the question that has to be asked is do we have the right to exclude from our society an establishment that we do not find agreeable because it opposes our individual moral code? As I said earlier, it's removal is only justified if laws are breached.
Steve Savage
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 12:59 pm
Now...where did I leave my rose tinted specs..........oh yes, next to my iced finger at Silvios in 1981.
Carol Jones
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 1:33 pm
Sarah, yes we most certainly do.Given the nature of this establishment I think it is our job as parents and residents of Wilmslow to put our foot down now otherwise who knows how many of these places will creep into our vicinity,and if it means judging others moral preferences then so be it,we need Wilmslow back to a busy shopping place not a nightspot.
Simon Worthington
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 3:26 pm
Put our foot down. You seem to be in a minority of one Carol. I would love to judge others moral preferences and remove their choices as some of them offend me greatly (see above) but I have been taught to respect their right to make their own choices. Maybe the aptly named "Wilmslow Taliban" could try the same.
Sarah Paterson
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 4:45 pm
There is a greater disruption to Wilmslow when services are held at the Church nearby. The majority of cars are parked illegally. I do not have a problem with that, but hang on a minute, are the "Taliban" only active at night?
Tony Newbolt
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 4:46 pm
Bottom line I would be asking to see those letters as I think they are from a template. I noticed the iPetition had anonymous who signed it several times and quite a few duplicate entries. Hope no one was counting letters and a signature on line as more than one especially anonymous as (s)he signed at least 6 times on the first page.? The club lawyers could have a field day. ST Lounge it may hurt a lot of your customers when council tax goes up but please please take these idiots to court.
Mike Dixon
Wednesday 17th April 2013 at 5:22 pm
I always try and shop in Wilmslow and have never ever been bothered by the front of the club, or have the friends who I have brought down with me. At night, I have never seen any problems outside the club, I believe the police didn't object?
So these narrow minded people want it shut, thank you very much for another empty shop front as well as the loss of rates and the loss of jobs to all employed inside.
Old Wilmslow has to change, Make Wilmslow Matter should look at what effects the majority, not what they don't see at night when they are tucked up in bed.
Julia Prestbury
Thursday 18th April 2013 at 1:47 pm
I have walked up and down Grove Street countless times and until all this started I had never even noticed the club - I doubt any children would notice it either. Surely it was better to have a business there rather than an empty shop just boarded up. I don't agree with it morally, but each to their own and I didn't have any objection to it being there.
Sally Hoare
Friday 19th April 2013 at 7:59 pm
Interesting that only one person has been in favour of the council`s actions here. Anyone can pass a petition round and their friends will sign it. Maybe it was at the Catholic church one Sunday.
Nobody has given any evidence of any problem caused by the ST club. I feel so sorry for the owners who have obviously worked hard to make their business work. A few years ago there were lots of problems at a previous bar on Grove Street. I want to know what has changed since the licence was granted last year.
Simon Worthington
Saturday 20th April 2013 at 10:08 am
I didn't know so many people read this blog. I have been involved in several conversations about this. Not one person in support of the decision and many old time residents of Wilmslow (I don't count- only 30 odd years) saying they are fed up of incomers dictating what they want. Even Mr. Silly has been outed!! It appears that the "Taliban" claimed that the venue intended to open all day which would clearly be unacceptable. Maybe the licence itself doesn't dictate opening hours hence the deception. Perhaps the owners should try a similar campaign and petition but with a little more honesty.
The disdainful attitude to the councillors involved was also surprising. Most comments would be censored!!
More comments about the Catholic Church - perhaps in the present climate they would be well advised to keep their heads down!
Stephen O'Grady
Tuesday 23rd April 2013 at 6:12 pm
Nothing about this bar offends me. Are parents walking by here at midnight with their young children? What offends me more, are children from the local school, purchasing cheap takeaways after school and dumping their empty or half eaten cartons in and around the church and grave yard!
Dave Cash
Thursday 25th April 2013 at 3:43 am
AFAIK the ST Lounge has not been forced to close, it still retains it's premises & alcohol licence, so can continue to operate within licensed opening times, just not offer additional entertainment requiring a SEV licence.
The Catholic Church may be on shaky moral ground, but highlighting St Therea's, Wilmslow is unfair. Objectors can be from any local religious congregation, or agnostics.
According to one late night TV channel/prog SK9 postcode has the highest incidence for mail order bondage items.
I hope owners of ST Lounge will apply for a Judicial Review of CEC decision
Vince Chadwick
Thursday 25th April 2013 at 9:57 am
Dave Cash says "The Catholic Church may be on shaky moral ground, but highlighting St Therea's, Wilmslow is unfair".

My reference to the Catholic Church was generic, not aimed specifically at St Theresa's. It was the objectors who were specific, citing the presence of that church among others as a reason not to renew the ST Lounge's licence. In view of the Catholic Churche's undoubted poor moral record, that struck me as ironic, to say the least.