Council to cut 25% of management posts

Sweeping changes will be made to the management structure of Cheshire East Council in response to the findings of the independent investigation into the causes of the failure of the Lyme Green development project.

In December the formal report into the Lyme Green fiasco, which has cost tax payers over £800,000, revealed serious weaknesses in the organisational culture of Cheshire East Council and serious management failings.

As a result of these findings a complete review of management roles and responsibilities will be carried out and the number of management positions will be reduced by at least 25% over the coming months.

Whilst the independent report will remain confidential the Council's Chief Executive, Kim Ryley, will shortly publish a report which will tackle the serious management failings identified by the investigator, by announcing bold and extensive changes to the Council's management structures and ways of working.

Leader of the Council, Michael Jones, said "Lyme Green has exposed serious weaknesses in our organisational culture, which are a product of the separate professional silos in our current management structure. These have caused confusion and inefficiency and have led to poor decisions by some senior staff, because it was not clear who had authority to act and who was ultimately accountable for the success or failure of the Lyme Green development project.

"The lack of proper communication between different Council services, together with uncertain lines of reporting up the management hierarchy, has led to poor management of the risks involved. As a result, public confidence in the Council has been dented and we must act swiftly to restore this.

"The investigator's report reveals a culture amongst some managers where, regrettably, there was no clarity about what was required to ensure a successful outcome at Lyme Green, and a lack of care over important parts of the process involved, such as early consultation with the local residents affected by the project.

"Lyme Green required staff from a range of different services to work together as a team, but relationships between the different professionals involved were sometimes strained. For this reason, necessary advice was sometimes neither sought nor taken at key stages in the project and, therefore, wrong assumptions were made as a result. This approach also meant there was insufficient challenge over key decisions and judgements, with staff not having the confidence to question these or being too reactive.

"To cure these failings quickly, I asked our interim Chief Executive, Kim Ryley, to bring forward proposals for sweeping changes to the Council's current management arrangements. These are designed to make us more effective in the future, by reducing management costs and overheads, whilst improving service performance accountability for outcomes. This will give the public better value for money."

The Council's Chief Executive, Kim Ryley, clarified that "As Head of Paid Service, I have a statutory role to advise elected Members of the Council on the best form of organisational structure, and on the numbers and types of posts needed to carry out the Council's functions, within the resources available to us. It is clear from the Lyme Green report, and from other major changes affecting us now and over the next few years, that we need to boldly rethink how the organisation is led and managed, from top to bottom.

"My proposals will seek to break down outdated professional silos, so that the Council works as a single team, with greater clarity over shared objectives and the desired outcomes to improve quality of life for local people. This has meant that a thorough and complete review of management roles and responsibilities at all levels is needed, and that necessary changes and improvements need to be put in place quickly over the coming months.

"The revised management arrangements will reduce the numbers of tiers of management, and will increase spans of responsibility to reduce the overall number of management posts by at least a quarter. As well as reducing costs to protect frontline jobs and services, the proposed changes will clarify managers' personal accountabilities and change working methods to strengthen integrated team effort and solutions across the organisation as a whole, so that everyone involved is clear of their role and responsibilities.

"The new structure will separate those whose job it is to design and purchase services for local people from those who are responsible for delivering services to them. It will bring together related functions and types of expertise to provide a more seamless, joined up approach to our wide range of activities. This will also have the benefit of making it easier for our local partners in the Police, Health, and Fire and Rescue Services – as well as for the public – to do business with us in the future.

"Recently, some interim changes have been made which already move the council in this direction, and our managers are keen to have an opportunity to show that it is unfair to judge the council on the basis of past failings. I believe that this approach will be supported by our staff and the trade unions, by our local partner organisations, and by councillors, given the obvious benefits involved.

"Once the proposals have been agreed by Councillors, the first phase of the new structure affecting the Council's top 40 staff will be in place by Easter, with the full management review being completed by the Summer. The approach will be designed to keep and develop the skills and experience of our most talented managers, and to retain enough capacity to carry out the major programme of service changes and improvements the Council has planned over the next few years."

Council Leader, Michael Jones, added "Although the Investigator's report must remain confidential, this report by the Chief Executive will provide the transparency that local people want about the causes of the Lyme Green project's failure, and will demonstrate that we have acted swiftly and decisively on the lessons learned about the need for more effective management of such important projects in future."

Following completion of the confidential report by the Designated Independent Person, two out of the three senior officers whose actions were investigated in relation to the Council's proposal to build a recycling station at Lyme Green Depot in Macclesfield resigned.

John Nicholson, Strategic Director Places and Organisational Capacity, and Caroline Elwood, Borough Solicitor, both resigned on December 13th 2012.

As reported yesterday, Councillor Rod Menlove, Environment Portfolio Holder and ward councillor for Wilmslow East, resigned this week over the Lyme Green debacle.

Click on the Lyme Green tag below to read previous articles relating to the failed project.

Tags:
Cheshire East Council, Cllr Michael Jones, Kim Ryley, Lyme Green
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Barry Stafford
Tuesday 8th January 2013 at 3:29 pm
Now ,Councillor Jones tell us how much the Independent report cost US!! The taxpayers.We now have £800,000 plus consultant fees,plus payoff to The ex Ceo and two directors mentioned in this article.Then there is payoffs to the 25% reduction in Managers.we all now these people walk straight into new jobs,with the golden packages already banked.Be amazed if i get a reply to this query.
Vic Barlow
Tuesday 8th January 2013 at 3:50 pm
"The new structure will separate those whose job it is to design and purchase services for local people from those who are responsible for delivering services to them. It will bring together related functions and types of expertise to provide a more seamless, joined up approach to our wide range of activities. This will also have the benefit of making it easier for our local partners in the Police, Health, and Fire and Rescue Services – as well as for the public – to do business with us in the future."


Anybody got any idea what this means???????
Philip Barton
Tuesday 8th January 2013 at 4:03 pm
It is the first time I have seen people complain about cutting down on management staff in the council. It is clear some people you cannot please.
Mike Jones has handled a bad situation well (first time I have seen public workers resign for their mistakes) + we get staff savings out of the investigation into the causes - sounds good to me.
Vic Barlow
Tuesday 8th January 2013 at 4:28 pm
Yes I agree.

Just not sure what the statement means?
Pete Taylor
Tuesday 8th January 2013 at 4:29 pm
Kym Ryley, the Chief Exec, is paid more than David Cameron. When he left his last position early (Chief Exec at Shropshire Council and, reportedly, in some disarray) it was decided not to replace him. Putting his name into Google reveals a rather interesting track record in local government.

It looks like no one is going to be held to account over this costly fiasco, yet all the names are presumably known to the inquiry team. Michael Jones is quoted as saying that the results must remain confidential i.e. as far as we the tax-payers are concerned- secret. Why; are prosecutions in the offing?

I see than Menlove has not, in fact, resigned, he is still a Councillor, he has just given up his Environment Portfolio post, which seems to be a rather good way of avoiding any blame in an area for which he was responsible.
Philip Barton
Tuesday 8th January 2013 at 4:41 pm
It looks like no one is going to be held to account over this costly fiasco?
John Nicholson, Strategic Director Places and Organisational Capacity, and Caroline Elwood, Borough Solicitor, both resigned on December 13th 2012.
read the article
Pete Taylor
Tuesday 8th January 2013 at 10:53 pm
I have read the article and much more. The fact that "two out of the three senior officers whose actions were investigated" have tendered their resignations, and thus presumably admitted their guilt, is not the same thing as those responsible being held to account. Until the cloak of secrecy is removed and the report made available to those who paid for it, there cannot be an acceptable resolution to this affair.

Incidentally, I'm sure that "Mike Jones" does not need you here as his apologist and is quite capable of speaking for himself on this forum.
Elaine Napier
Tuesday 8th January 2013 at 10:55 pm
You might like to Google Caroline Ellwood too. She left her last employment with a significant payment and then sought to obtain a further payment of £10,000 to compensate her for hurt feelings.

Oh my stars. The local authorities of this country give every appearance of being a web of mismanagement, lies, incompetence, carelessness and corruption. And those involved in them just move round and round from Council to Council like some hideous Danse Macabre, taking their payoffs as they go.
Stephen Justice
Wednesday 9th January 2013 at 12:03 am
I think the statement Vic Barlow finds so perplexing is a very wordy attempt to say the council will reorganise around services and separate the policing of the delivery from the delivery itself.

This should mean a: people are working together on defined outcomes for the good of the community and b: somebody with nothing to hide is keeping an eye on how each outcome is realised.

I think... and hope...I'm right.

As for the culpable - surely we have the right to know who any guilty people are and to be reassured that they are CERTAINLY NOT being paid off but simply and quite justifiably being dismissed for being in breach of the contracts which otherwise would result in generous severance.

However since earlier departures seem to have cost us all dearly I rather suspect any others will be equally well compensated for their loss of office.

As for the promised staff reduction, this is obviously good to hear, but again will no doubt be expensive to implement. I presume that the expensive and much maligned in google sources Mr Ryley will understandably have put his own position forward as one of those which can be eliminated without any detriment to the on going "back to business" operations?

Somehow I sense we will see much more about this sorry story for some time to come yet.
Vic Barlow
Wednesday 9th January 2013 at 4:17 pm
Thanks Stephen
I suspect working at the sharp end of retail would cure their love of convoluted management speak.
When did you hear Tesco or M& S saying:
"Our new store will separate those whose job it is to design and purchase services for local people from those who are responsible for delivering services to them. It will bring together related functions and types of expertise to provide a more seamless, joined up approach to our wide range of products."?
The competition would laugh you into insolvency.
Chris Wigley
Wednesday 9th January 2013 at 10:27 pm
Over time all organisations will have to review there management structures..........but hey Cheshire East was only established in 2009 and had the opportunity at that stage to develop a structure for the future. Now we are told that 25% of management jobs are going, surely the question is, if 25% of jobs were needed in the first place why have we been funding them for 3 years?

We were only months into the new authority, when it decided to make redundant 40 social works, why did this not happen as part of the winding up of the old Cheshire County Council, but let's not hold that against, let's hope they CE learns by it past errors and that we don't have headlines (Daily Express 3/7/10) COUNCIL REHIRES BOSSES WHO GOT £100,000 PAYOFFS "The trio were working for Cheshire East’s adult services department when they were made redundant before Easter with unconfirmed payoffs estimated to be about £100,000 each."

When the authority was formed we had the then chief executive appointed at £190,000 and then was such an uproar I remember the then leader Mr Fitzgerald justifying that you had to pay to get the best. Well given the structure she put in place that allowed the debacle of Lyme Green (that is probably nearer to £1 million wasted) and the lack of cabinet implementation of sufficient checks and balances, I really shudder if we had gone for second best!

What I would have supported was the council summarily dismissing without notice the former chief executive, borough solicitor and the deputy chief executive and risked them claiming unfair dismissal. Instead we saw the Chief Executive leaving with a payment of a little short of £100,000 in lieu of notice and the other two undisclosed amounts.............it's only money, but it just happens to be yours and mine.

One can only term the residents of Cheshire East as 'Lions led by donkeys', we really did deserve better than Fitzgerald and now Jones & Co.
Pete Taylor
Thursday 10th January 2013 at 11:30 pm
Philip Barton, are you by any chance Councillor Gary Philip Barton, or is the name just a co-incidence?