A538 roadworks complete

b45a0f36b41256e0ed00978b575478d2

Roadworks to install a new roundabout on the A538 have been completed after 14 weeks of temporary traffic lights, which have caused long tail-backs for motorists.

The roundabout is designed to provide access to Waters Corporation's new mass spectrometer facility on Altrincham Road.

Landscape works will be carried out in the New Year and a newly-built footpath and cycle link from the junction of Mobberley Road and Altrincham Road, will mark the completion of the project in Autumn 2013.

A spokesperson for Cheshire East Council said "The temporary 30mph speed limit along Altrincham Road will remain until the completion of the new Waters Corporation buildings, during which time the Council's highways team will undertake a review of the speed limit.

"The move follows positive feedback from nearby business owners who report that the temporary speed restriction may have helped curb road traffic accidents.

"The speed review will take into account vehicle speeds, visibility, police comments and feedback from members of the public.

"Commuters and residents are thanked for their cooperation while the works have been underway."

Waters Corporation's new mass spectrometry headquarters will accommodate more than 500 employees who are currently located on four separate sites in South Manchester and Altrincham. They will be relocated to the 37-acre Stamford Lodge site over a 12 month period.

Tags:
Cheshire East Council, Roadworks, Waters Corporation
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Rob McCall
Tuesday 11th December 2012 at 3:12 pm
I'm not quite sure that the driver of the Transit minibus who ended up parked in the hedge just into the section of road they've altered would agree that either the speed limit or the alterations have curbed road traffic accidents. But then I think the council have been looking for a reason to drop the speed limit on that section of road for some time.
Simon Worthington
Tuesday 11th December 2012 at 4:43 pm
So the truth is out! The first outline of this eyesore which has encroached on green belt stated 300 employees. Wilmslow will soon be in constant gridlock when there are "over 500" employees at this site, the new logistics hub with over a million square feet is built and other plans by Manchester Council are approved close to the M56, 900+ houses are built in Woodford, maybe a 1000 in Handforth - plus however many more "our" council approve in Wilmslow. The destruction of our pleasant village comes ever closer.

Who are the nearby business owners who have reported "that the temporary speed restriction may have helped curb road traffic accidents." Can we have some names?
Sally Hoare
Tuesday 11th December 2012 at 9:58 pm
How long has Wilmslow been a village? Not in the 20+ years I have lived here. Surely these new employees will be potential customers for Wilmslow businesses.
Peter Davenport
Tuesday 11th December 2012 at 11:10 pm
Just a thought. Who has paid for the roundabout? Our cash strapped council or the well heeled contractors? With 800 employees, will mean 800 cars in the area each day, morning and evening.
What is goig to be done easing traffic congestion in Wilmslow, which around Parsonnage Green area, within 300 yards has an enormous problems with cross flow traffic, in the Tesco area. From the side roads there there are about 15 permutations into which direction is going to go from the side roads
David Woolliscroft
Thursday 13th December 2012 at 12:03 pm
Re "So the truth is out! The first outline of this eyesore which has encroached on green belt " Hardly green belt. Before the development for laboratories, the site was used for - well - laboratories. It does seem a little odd that in the midst of one of the deepest recessions in living memory a firm offering to bring in hundreds of jobs is somehow a bad thing. Presumably they would be fine so long as they were on someone else's doorstep.
Vince Chadwick
Thursday 13th December 2012 at 1:58 pm
The jobs already exist and are already filled. The development is a consolidation of several existing south Manchester sites, not an expansion with associated employment opportunities.
Briany Smith
Saturday 15th December 2012 at 12:44 pm
My partner is a current Waters employee who will be moving to the new site once built. We are hoping to move to Wilmslow so that he can be closer to his workplace. My partner currently travels to work on public transport as I know many other Waters employees do. It would be interesting to know what additional public transport options will be put in place to help get employees to the site and also ease congestion in the area. Altrincham Road does not appear to be a very safe cycle route and we cannot afford to run two cars! A shuttle bus that made stops at the train station, town centre and other key pick-up/drop-off points seems a sensible solution to me.
Simon Worthington
Saturday 15th December 2012 at 5:30 pm
Sally: Are any of the 500+ people who are already employed by Waters (no new jobs - thanks Vince) likely to come near Wilmslow during their commute or during work time? None of the workers from the "new town" planned by Manchester council will.
David: Most of the relatively small previous developement was surrounded by grass and trees which have now gone and the site is completely surrounded by greenbelt/playing fields. There is a lovely large vacant site on Stanley Green which would have done the job.
Rebecca: Having recently made use of the fantastic free bus service in Manchester city centre the idea should certainly be considered especially for the pupils of Wilmslow High School whose Mummies and Daddies cause havoc on the bypass and roads to the west of the school every morning and afternoon. I have heard said that one must take one's children to school by car to keep them safe from the other people taking their children to school by car!!!
Rob Sawyer
Sunday 16th December 2012 at 12:38 am
Hello All - CycleWilmslow, and others, did lobby for quality cycling routes to, and past, the site (for commuters to the site and passing cycling traffic). Sadly the final cycling route will involve crossing the A34 twice between the petrol station and Honeybee. We are seeking clarity of the exact nature of cycling/walking provision either side of the actual site as the s106 money ("planning gain" funding given to CEC by Waters) will only stretch so far. It was decided not to re-route existing public transport bus routes past the site.
Mark Russell
Tuesday 18th December 2012 at 1:35 pm
Rob - Cyclists that are not commuiting to waters can use the cycle route that goes down Mobberly road and then Nansmoss Lane or can carry on down Mobberly road to come out by the honey bee pub thus cutting out a large section of the main road.

And a cycle path starts going down the hill, so i dont see the need to spend a load of money putting a new one in when there is an existing one there, i and my club use it all the time and its fine.