Lobby groups oppose plans for World Logistics Hub off A538

roadnetwork

Manchester Airports Group (MAG) has submitted an outline planning application for the development of a World Logistics Hub on former green belt land off the A538 Wilmslow Road.

The plans will create between 1.2 to 1.4 million square feet of new logistics space in the southern part of Greater Manchester's Enterprise Zone which the company says will generate more than 1,800 new jobs for local people over the next 10 to 15 years.

The proposed development is for a mixture of medium and small sized logistics units ranging from approximately 7,500 to 200,000 square feet across a 36.9 hectare site next to Junction 6 of the M56 motorway, and close to the existing airport freight area.

The proposals also include 14.8 hectares of new landscaped areas and habitats surrounding the site.

John Atkins, MAG's Airport City Director, said: "This scheme will create a sustainable commercial product of international significance that will provide high quality and well-connected logistics facilities with access to the global marketplace and a population of over 24m people within a two-hour drive time.

"This connectivity will create an exceptional opportunity to improve international trade, cut transit times and drive more efficient, sustainable supply chains whilst supporting the local community, increasing employment opportunities and stimulating economic activity in the North West."

Primary access to World Logistics Hub will be via the A538 Wilmslow Road, with junction upgrades made at Sunbank Lane.

Several members of the A556 Lobby Group joined members of Ringway Parish Council, action group Stop Expansion at Manchester Airport and over 80 local residents on Wednesday 5th September to voice their opposition to the proposed World Logistic Hub which they say "would see 90 acres of former greenbelt land wiped out in favour of 43 cargo warehouses and almost 1,500 car parking spaces".

Matt Parkinson, from the A556 Lobby Group, was one of those who attended. He said "We have long suspected that the proposed A556 bypass has more to do with facilitating Government plans for the massive expansion of Manchester Airport, than to provide an "environmental improvement" to the people living alongside the current A556.

"We expressed our concerns that the developments around Manchester Airport are being brought to the public's attention piecemeal, these will affect a much wider surrounding area ultimately engulfing significant parts of Cheshire into the planned "Airport City" and supporting infrastructure.

"This latest proposal from the airport to build a 'World Logistics Centre' on countryside near Ashley will see further irreversible destruction of our Cheshire countryside. We feel the time has come for all local groups fighting to save their villages, countryside and way of life to join together, to realise the bigger picture and to oppose the notion of 'growth' at any cost. We believe the vast majority of people would prefer to see targeted investment in sustainability in order to create jobs which genuinely benefit society, human well-being and our environment rather than local MP, George Osborne's obsession with growth for growths sake."

Claims that the development will create employment for the area were rejected by the lobby groups.

Audrey O'Donovan, Chairman of Ringway Parish Council said "The plans for a 'World Logistics Hub' would involve the eviction of residents, the destruction of valuable greenspace for local people, an increase in traffic congestion, carbon emissions and noise pollution from the Airport's cargo services.

"The area to the south of the Airport is currently home to residential houses and greenfields and also borders onto Cotterill Clough - a Site of Special Scientific Interest.

"The Airport claim new jobs will be created. However, many of these jobs will not be 'new' but simply 'displaced' as existing firms re-locate from other areas of Greater Manchester to take advantage of the cheap business rates on offer."

The World Logistics Hub is located in the southern part of Greater Manchester's Enterprise Zone. Designated as an Enterprise Zone by the UK Government in March 2011, it is centred on the Airport City project, which aims to transform Manchester Airport from a regional transport hub into an international business destination in its own right, attracting global businesses that would not have otherwise located in the region, or even the UK.

The £650m Airport City scheme – the first of its kind in the UK – was unveiled by Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, in January 2012. Around 1.5 million sq ft of office space; 650,000 sq ft of advanced manufacturing; around 2,500 new hotel beds; and up to 100,000 sq ft of retail and leisure, will also be developed on land surrounding Manchester Airport's public transport interchange and to north of the M56 spur road - which they anticipate will create up to 20,000 new jobs over the next 15 years.

The outline planning application, submitted to Manchester City Council, follows consultation by Manchester Airports Group with local residents and businesses. For more information see www.airportcity.co.uk.

Tags:
Manchester Airport, Planning Applications
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Mark Russell
Tuesday 11th September 2012 at 6:20 pm
Fantasic news for the area, 1,800 jobs created plus the jobs it will cement for the companies associated in the local area like suppliers, transport firms, bus/taxi firms etc etc.

I think certain people need to realise that this country is on its knees and we need developments like this to bring money into the country and turn Manchester Airport from a regional airport into an International hub which we will ALL benifit from in the long run.

I live near the airport, and the extra traffic/airplanes etc wont bother me, i will take comfort in knowing there will be more opportunities for my family and friends in the long term, and more money going into the local economy.
Andrew Backhouse
Tuesday 11th September 2012 at 8:05 pm
It is nice to hear of new jobs as Mark says. We do need them. I wonder though why it is necessary to put the new jobs on to the green belt, when there are large areas of land on the edges of Wythenshawe - e.g. the old Ferranti site, which are derelict or underused. I also suspect that with oil going up in price, climate change, we need to look at being more sustainable locally, with jobs acccessilbe by train/walking rather than import everything and depend on the car, and in 15 - 20 years time, a new development on this site would be seen as stupid. Don't we need the agricultural land to grow crops given the rising prices of foodstuffs with growing populations too? Finally, I understand that there is some evidence that the 1800 jobs said to be created are ones that are currently in the centre of Manchester......So I am not in favour.
Derek Stevens
Wednesday 12th September 2012 at 8:18 am
The area that the plan refers to was bought some time ago by the airport and they paid a considerable sum for it. They will not want to look for another site when they have this area for development
Mary R. Perkins
Wednesday 12th September 2012 at 9:22 am
As a Manchester resident I have strong sympathy for the residents whom this development would affect if it were to go ahead.

Mark, it won't create many new jobs - most of the businesses that would move there are ones already in Manchester who would simply relocate. And, as Andrew ways, there are other areas of land that would be just as good for the development but without all the negative consequences this site incurs.

Having looked at the proposed site, it would be a crime for this lovely green area to be swamped by this development. The land lost it's green-belt status a month ago, but when Manchester airport bought the land it *was* green belt land, and they knew this, so they should respect that. The land also borders a SSSI, so I hate to think of the impact on biodiversity etc, never mind on the people who will be evicted from their homes, etc.

The airport owns other land in the area that would be far more suitable, so by all means consider the development, if it will really create more jobs (which I doubt), but do it on land more suited to the purpose. Last I heard there were loads of buildings in the existing cargo centre that they were struggling to rent out to businesses anyway, so I am not even convinced of the need for this development.

All in all, don't do it. But, if you must to do it, then pick a better site.
Mark Russell
Wednesday 12th September 2012 at 10:03 am
Mary, the reason there may be empty plots on the current cargo centre will be fit for purpose (or not fit for purpose in this case) Multi national companies want purpose built, up to date facilities that they can use. Think companies like, Fed Ex, DHL, UPS etc to name a few. These are the sort of people we want into the area. Remeber the famous saying "build it and they will come". It needs to be next to the airport to make logistic sense, its no good being 10 miles away, they wont come then. I agree its a shame some green land will be lost, but there is lots more around our area. We need to protect jobs so we keep people in the area to enjoy the countryside, or people will have to move away to where the jobs are, like say the south east.
Steve Kennedy
Wednesday 12th September 2012 at 8:41 pm
Excellent news and i would agree totally with Marks comments. We recently lost FedEx from near the airport, for growth they had to move to Trafford Park, this is the sort of initiative which may lure them back, or even UPS from their green field North Rode site.
Pete Taylor
Thursday 13th September 2012 at 10:10 am
Manchester Airport bought this Green Belt site... and it was then taken out of the Green Belt. how does that work? Don't bother; I think I know the answer.

I was rather surprised that Manchester Airport did not bid for the Woodford airfield; a separate site for freight-handling seems to be common in many countries. Of course, whilst Woodford has a pristine runway capable of taking everything, including Antonovs, the rest of the infrastructure was probably too expensive to replace.