Aborted recycling centre costs taxpayers £800,000

A review of the Council's proposal to build a recycling station at Lyme Green Depot in Macclesfield has revealed that the aborted plans have cost Cheshire East taxpayers over £800,000.

The report, published today, also confirms that planning rules were broken, as the main contractor commenced work on the site before planning permission had been granted, officers did not comply with EU Procurement Regulations or ensure there was effective reporting to members of the council.

They also spent beyond the approved budget on the scheme breaking Finance and Contract Procedure Rules.

The approved capital budget for the scheme was £650,000, but the total anticipated spend for the Lyme Green scheme at mid-May was £810,000.

Despite the cost of the project altering significantly from the figure approved by Council a revised business case was never submitted to the Capital Asset Group and the additional expenditure was committed without the approval of Cabinet.

Work began at the site on 24th October 2011, three weeks prior to a planning application being submitted on 16th November 2011.

Work ceased on 30th November 2011 after objections from planning officers and ward member, as well as complaints from local residents. The planning application was deferred by the Strategic Planning Board on 18th January 2012 and subsequently withdrawn on 17th February 2012.

The report, commissioned by the Chief Executive and Leader, recommends "The Council as a regulatory authority, should not undertake development without planning permission even if adverse publicity is unlikely. It should apply the same standards to its own applications as it does to third parties.

"In the future all Council development projects should go through the same planning processes as third party applicants in order to ensure a consistent level of service between external applications and our own planning applications."

During a meeting with Cllr Michael Jones, Leader of Cheshire East Council, today he told me "This is not a good day for Cheshire East Council but it is a good opportunity.

"Clearly processes have not been adhered to and I as leader will ensure that this situation will be addressed in its full. We will implement robust processes to stop this happening again and they will be extensive.

"I know it is a lot of money but it is not wasted money unless we don't go to that site in the future."

The Audit and Governance Committee will consider the report at a meeting on Thursday, 14th June. Members will be asked to consider the findings and recommendations of the Internal Audit investigation, review the conduct of staff mentioned in the report and consider whether there is a case for disciplinary action to be taken.

Cllr Michael Jones added "We will announce our decisions after 14th June. I do think there will have to be a constituential change. This is something we will take robust action on and I see it as an opportunity to take Cheshire East Council forward.

"This gives me a chance to get things right. It is a terrible report but I relish the opportunity to make it work."

He added "Processes should never again be broken without severe consequences."

The Audit and Governance Committee will meet to discuss this report at 2pm on Thursday, June 14th in the McIlroy Suite at Macclesfield Town Football Club. The meeting is open to members of the public.

Click here to read the report in full and associated appendixes.

Tags:
Cheshire East Council, Lyme Green, Recycling, Waste Disposal
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Raymond Acton
Friday 8th June 2012 at 2:22 pm
It is the first time that I have heard a complete shambles described as a good opportunity.Is it like Napoleon's position after Waterloo? But of course the same person managed to describe the Wilmslow Vision as a victory for Cheshire East (among others).I wonder what the third victory will be?
Friday 8th June 2012 at 3:31 pm
Yes Ray, so presumably should CEC have the bad luck to actually save money , that would be a disaster and lead to resignations without the need for "enquiries". Or to put it another way, kick the problem around and hope the voters forget.
Manuel Golding
Friday 8th June 2012 at 5:40 pm
Look out folks, yes you the council taxpayers of Cheshire East! Councillor Jones is now threatening us, as he says without an inkling of irony -
"This is something we will take robust action on and I see it as an opportunity to take Cheshire East Council forward.This gives me a chance to get things right. It is a terrible report but I relish the opportunity to make it work."
He actually relishes the opportunity! Rather like a defeated Napolean (thanks Ray) who would have "relished" another crack at the victorious enemy. It was his men, and this is our over taxed money Councillor Jones.
Please spare us, and save our money, from such incompetent and arrogant individuals.
Elaine Napier
Monday 11th June 2012 at 1:34 pm
No wonder they can't meet their obligations to the sick, vulnerable and disabled of Cheshire East - or even mend the holes in the roads and pavements. They're too busy being a total disgrace to the face of public service. £80,000 to cover Wenzel's absence, £800,000 to cover the disgraceful behaviour of this lot.

Just exactly who are these people? Who will manage their disciplinary process? And how do they get away with this stuff time and time again? If the rest of us abused the trust and finances of the public in this way, we'd be arrested.

The words 'resign' and 'go to jail' spring to mind here.
Elaine Napier
Tuesday 12th June 2012 at 10:39 pm
Sorry everyone, I just can't help being continually astonished by this stuff. I've just been reading through the papers for the CEC meeting mentioned in Lisa Reeve's excellent article above. And, goodness me, look at this little extract from Lorraine Butcher's report on the Waste Recycling matter.

8.0 Legal Implications (Authorised by the Council’s Deputy Monitoring
Officer)
8.1 All employees must ensure that they use any Council or other public
funds entrusted to them through their job role in a responsible and
lawful manner.

Wonder where they will go with that one.
Keith Harris
Wednesday 13th June 2012 at 12:37 pm
Yet another Cheshire East Council disaster no matter what 'positive' ' relish' 'robust' and other nonsense language these management speaking 'moving forward' idiots spend our money on. Here is a good one, let's identify every fool that was responsible for this travesty and sack them immediately. No sweet backhanders either as I am sure there are some very senior people involved in this. Then we can at least claw back a little of the our council taxes which have been needlessly wasted on this project.
Elaine Napier
Friday 15th June 2012 at 12:11 pm
Hi everyone. Sorry to keep going on about this, but I've got this question ... can anyone help please?

Michael Jones, the new leader of the Council, was previously (from Sept 2011 to his election as leader in March this year) the Portfolio Holder for Resources. I wanted to know what that meant so I looked on the CEC website and found this list. "Finance, construction of medium term financial strategy and annual budget report, capital programme, capital strategy, reserves strategy, income and funding strategy, treasury management, business management, insurance, audit, democratic services, civic matters, electoral services and member training and development."

If you care to take a look at Appendix A on page 47 of the report presented to the Audit and Governance Committee on Thursday, 14 June, you will see that it is a timeline for activities relating to the waste transfer project.
http://moderngov.cheshireeast.gov.uk/ecminutes/Published/C00000486/M00004516/$$ADocPackPublic.pdf

Annex A (page 19) is also quite interesting, because it shows clearly that the main contractor was on site and working by 24 October 2011, even though the planning application for the project was not even received, much less examined and approved, until 16 November 2011. So all this stuff was going on while Michael Jones was in charge of Resources.

So this is my question. If you are the councillor with particular responsibility for finance and all that other stuff listed above, wouldn't you be expected to know that the Council's officers are pouring money out, breaking EU procurement laws and their own rules? If you would be expected to know that, did Michael Jones actually know what was going on? And, if he didn't, why didn't he? Was he deliberately kept in the dark? Or was he hoping for an unobtrusive resolution?

Whatever the answer to my question, Michael Jones tells us that sorting out all this stuff is an opportunity, that he relishes this opportunity, and so on (see Lisa Reeves' report above). Bah, it's not an opportunity, it's a scandalous disgrace and it seems that some very senior people were implicated in it.

Don't stop watching this everyone please. I have a very bad feeling that they are just waiting for it all to die down so that they can bury it in a dark place. The HR Manager said at yesterday's meeting that no-one implicated in this had been suspended while the enquiry took place because he was waiting for more evidence. How much evidence do they need?
Manuel Golding
Friday 15th June 2012 at 2:32 pm
Unfortunately for the council tax payers of Cheshire East, the sad, sorry and expensive story of mismanagement at and by this council does not stop with the Macclesfield "aborted recycling centre". That has cost a mere £810,000, add to this the £80,000 Wenzel cover, plus a cool £50,000 fine by the Information Commissoner and add a wasted £30,000 for the third rate, biased, poorly presented, uninformed (some may say deliberately so) etc etc Wilmslow Vision charade.

These come to near enough staggering 1Million quid of tax payers' money. Wasted. Chucked away like confetti at a wedding.

And, frighteningly, these are the wastages we know of!

In council speak these are surely and purely "opportunities", "to learn from" and such nonesense talk. No appologies, no (offers of) resignations of either senior cabinet councillor(s) or senior management, no dismissals, nothing.

Cheshire East Council just goes on its merry way as if nothing had happened, playing Monopoly with tax payers money whilst the borough crumbles from a lack of basic infrastructure maintenance (roads, pathways, lighting, cleansing etc).

Cllr. Michael Jones, councillors involved in these fiascos and senior managers, should publicly apologies for all the wastages that have occured on his and their watch or go. This should have been his signal for his "opportunity" to say sorry. In yesteryear, holders of "high" office, entrusted with the care of the public purse, would have done the honourable thing and resigned. But then, they were people of honour.
Saturday 16th June 2012 at 11:06 am
Thank you Elaine for your piece of forensic research, we the Readers of Lisa's splendid epaper are very grateful. No, you are not going on about the issue, you have shed some light on what before these enlightened times, of instant mass communication, could well have been matters swept under the carpet. Not any more.
Regret that I cannot answer your question but here is another! How long do you think it will be before due processes have taken place, and responsibility for the shambles layed at the doors of those responsible?
Brendan Murphy
Tuesday 19th June 2012 at 8:03 pm
Don't be too cynical just yet. Your comments are not falling on deaf ears.
Stuart Redgard
Thursday 21st June 2012 at 6:26 pm
I have just read a significant amount of the documents posted at http://moderngov.cheshireeast.gov.uk/ecminutes/Published/C00000486/M00004516/$$ADocPackPublic.pdf which are public records and reports on this matter.

I am a Chartered Engineer who has over 20 years experience of working in the Design, Project Management and Construction sector. I am absolutely appalled at what has been allowed to happen at Cheshire East Council. There is evidence of clear miss management which has lead to both European and English laws being broken.

I am so appalled that I have spent sometime trying to determine how as a council tax payer I can ensure that this matter is dealt with accordingly. If you want to register a complaint about this project then do so my contacting the the audit commission on 0117 975 3131 and asking for the details of the locally appointed auditor for Cheshire East (Judith Tench). I contacted her yesterday and had a very informative discussion.

I will also be writing to our MP and asking him to look into this matter.
Elaine Napier
Sunday 24th June 2012 at 12:35 pm
Lisa, with Stuart Redgard's permission, I think his post with contact details for the Audit Commissioner for Cheshire East should be reposted on all your sites (Alderley Edge, Knutsford and Prestbury).

Is that possible please?