Councillors have refused to grant Manchester Airport planning permission for a new 800 space car park within the Green Belt in Styal until more information is provided, as they are not convinced that the airport has no other options.
Members of the Northern Planning Committee voted to defer the application for a new car park on Moss Lane in Styal, which lies within the with the operation area of Manchester Airport, on Wednesday, 14th August, requesting "additional information from the applicant to explain the necessity of this car park structure and that there are no alternatives to show the business case that there are no other practical alternatives to taking this piece of land out of the Green Belt."
Manchester Airport are seeking planning permission to demolish two properties on Moss Lane and their associated outbuildings in order to construct an extension to their existing car park which will provide an additional 800 spaces. The car park would operate 24 hours a day, and customers will self-park and then board buses to the terminals.
Speaking after an initial vote to approve the application (where 4 for members voted in favour, 5 against and 2 abstained) Councillor Andrew Gregory said "The reason is that very special circumstances put forward have not been made out to my satisfaction.
"Those special circumstances being the fact that the airport has only this opportunity to create additional car parking, I don't accept that. Secondly, as I understand the reasons for special circumstances are to reduce the number of what is described as 'kiss and fly' visits to the airport, again I don't accept that as a being a special circumstance to justify why we could depart from the usual principles and rules on safeguarding our Green Belt."
Councillor Nick Mannion said "The reason why I couldn't support this is this is a commercial decision by the airport and I don't think they are offering up enough in return for that for the damage. They're taking land out of the Green Belt, they are going to concrete over land."
He added "I have not been convinced there are no other options to concreting over this piece of the Green Belt. I am not convinced this is the only deliverable option. I am not talking about commercial I am talking about practical now. They want to extend what is already an enormous car park which they control, they manage, they provide the shuttle bus to and from."
In a second vote members of the Northern Planning Committee voted in favour of deferring the proposal (with 9 votes in favour, 1 against and 1 member abstaining) requesting "additional information from applicant to explain the necessity of this car park structure and that there are no alternatives" to show the business case and that there are no other practical alternatives to taking this piece of land out of the Green Belt.
The proposal is considered to be an inappropriate form of development in the Green Belt, which reduces openness, encroaches into the countryside, and contributes to the unrestricted sprawl of large built up areas.
However, the planning officer recommended the application for approval having taking into account the considerations in favour of the proposal, which included the applicant's strategy to reduce the amount of kiss and fly / taxi journeys to the airport, the limitations of the existing public transport services, the operation of existing on site car parking facilities at capacity during the summer months, and the reduction of third party off site car parking options over recent years which are considered to demonstrate that the car park is necessary for the operational efficiency and amenity of the airport.
Photo: View North from Moss Lane.
Comments
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.
Look at Heathrows 3rd runway.. and once again Alexander Boris de-Pfeffel Johnsons hollow objections and AWOL status re same... I hope CEC are robust enough to challenge this.
Come on Mr. CE councillor, pin your colours to the mast.
A posting on Nextdoor might generate some interest as it covers the Lacey Green ward which includes Styal.
Concreting over the green belt is not the only solution. Styal must not become a terminal 4.
The alternative is to provide multi storey car parking on existing airport carpark land. In suggesting this as an alternative this proposal is contrary to national and local planning policies.
A second alternative would be to improve rail connections into the airport both the service frequencies and the links from the airport station into the terminals and refuse planning permission for all these private parking sites.
Mind you given the actions of the Swedish useful idiot (see Sunday Times) we won't be flying much in the future.
The Cheshire East Borough boundary needs to be robustly defended.
Quite right.
Greta Thunberg has done more to focus peoples attention on the effects of Climate Change than a succession of political leaders....including Caroline Lucas.
Hypocrisy and greed, nothing more.