New legislation could increase waste collection costs by £650,000 a year

bins

Cheshire East Council is being forced to carry out an assessment of it waste collection service to ensure it complies with new legislation.

From January 2015, under the revised Waste Framework Directive in respect to the Waste (England and Wales) regulations 2011, separate collections of recyclable glass, metal, paper and plastic from householders are required.

However, the regulations do allow authorities an element of discretion to co mingle those wastes where it is not technically, environmentally or economically practicable (TEEP) to have separate collections.

As the Council collects dry recyclables in one 'silver bin' they will need to demonstrate that it would be unnecessary and uneconomic to switch to separate collections and that the processed recycling streams being produced is of the same standard, as if it had been sorted at the kerbside.

The Council has commissioned waste consultants to produce a 'TEEP Assessment' which has concluded that "It should be clear that the current system has been chosen because it is seen as more technically practicable, environmental and economic than collecting the four materials separately."

The TEEP assessment states that if the recyclable materials were collected separately, and there were still fortnightly collections, the increase in costs would be almost £650,000 per annum (ca. 28% increase or almost £4 per household).

The TEEP assessment will be considered at a meeting of the New Delivery Vehicles and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee on January 8th aims to demonstrate that that there is no necessity to collect the four materials separately and that it is not 'technically, environmentally and economically practicable' (TEEP) to do so. It is then scheduled to be received and approved by the Cabinet in March 2015.

If the TEEP assessment is not accepted then the collection of kerbside waste in a single silver bin will have to be changed to accommodate four different waste streams.

Click here for further information and to read the TEEP assessment.

Tags:
Cheshire East Council
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Barry Stafford
Wednesday 7th January 2015 at 12:40 pm
I think the silver bin system is ideal.We don't need more bins.In some areas they can have five bins per house/flat..Totally stupid,a total eyesore in front gardens.I understood our silver bins are sorted at a recycling unit outside of CEC?? If the council wants to save money and do another survey.can I suggest many houseolds,especially flats/shared drives/single households can share a black bin,silver and even the green bin,where there is little garden waste.All my neighbors have done this,we are mainly mature singles some couples,but it works.Saves the bin collectors time,and having 3 bins each.
Brian McGavin
Wednesday 7th January 2015 at 12:59 pm
This supposed directive is a huge waste of money when the area has dealt with the existing bin arrangements successfully for years. Why do the metal, plastic, glass wastes now need to be collected separately? It will cause more fuel burning trucks to collect these wastes separately. They can be separated by technology. Next door Manchester has about five waste bin colours for items rather than the more sensible three bins used by Cheshire East which causes even more ugly clutter outside premises. Some terrace houses with very little space are in a hopeless position to accommodate so many bins and when many thoughtless people with ample space or garages habitually leave their bins permanently in prime positions on the drive, the whole streetscape starts to look like a rubbish dump. Councils need to target this growing problem. There seems to be no best practice consistency in collection standards.
Sally Hoare
Wednesday 7th January 2015 at 1:40 pm
I hope Cheshire East can persuade the Powers that be, that ours is a good system. It has worked well for several years now. One thing I learnt from carrying out research for DEFRA some years ago was that the simpler the system, the more people will comply. In Cheshire West they have 6 bins and then sort some items at the kerbside. Imagine trying to get down the street when this is taking place. I actually thought Cheshire East should be applauded for this simple, straightforward system! What do I know?
Andrew Malloy
Wednesday 7th January 2015 at 2:36 pm
I agree with the comments above, the Cheshire East initiative is ingenious, and makes life so much easier for people to recycle without the hassle and confusion of getting what goes in what bin. Surely separate collections would be more damaging to the environment, with more vehicles being required to collect the waste materials?
I do wish we were more like Germany where they recycle for reuse rather than re-manufacture, but we're just too lazy in this country to take our bottles back to the shop, so CEC's scheme is a next best option.
Haven't recycling figure in the Cheshire East area increased significantly since this scheme was introduced? They'd surely drop dramatically if it was removed.
Kate Ravenscroft
Wednesday 7th January 2015 at 3:40 pm
Not all waste can be 'sorted by technology', much waste from households is still sorted by hand. Mixed collections, while they are easier for the householder (although even then many still don't recycle) cause contamination further on in the process when the material comes to be reprocessed into 'new' material.
It's a very complicated issue and there's probably no easy solution - what we have in Cheshire East is better than some and worse than others. It's too simplistic to reduce this issue to an argument about how many binds we have outside our houses!
DELETED ACCOUNT
Wednesday 7th January 2015 at 3:57 pm
Kate there are areas of Wilmslow where the lorries cannot reach the existing bins - owners/ocupiers have to wheel their bins down to link roads each week for them to be collected. Afterwards they wheel them back to occupy the postage stamp sized front gardens outside their terraced houses. Can you image doing this for 5 different coloured bins? The point is that we generate too much waste and that will continue to be the problem until supermarkets are challenged over it. Also what is wrong with paper bags rather than plastic ones? The former are easily composted the latter have to be reprocessed.
Simon Worthington
Wednesday 7th January 2015 at 4:02 pm
This is one of the few things our council got right. Multiple boxes are much less likely to be used effectively and the collection would cause more traffic problems and pollution. If it ain't broke don't fix it!
Kate Ravenscroft
Thursday 8th January 2015 at 9:02 am
Jackie - I live in one of those houses! I haven't suggested we should have more bins only that making the number of bins or additional bins the main focus of the argument is simplifying it too much. There is no perfect solution but there are very good reasons for separating the waste efficiently at all stages and one of those stages is at the kerbside.
Also, at this time the local authority is only going through the assessment process, no one has actually said we will have more bins yet! Except for the people making comments on here...
DELETED ACCOUNT
Thursday 8th January 2015 at 3:49 pm
Kate point taken, but decisions at CE tend to follow a pattern these days. Firstly, publicise the problem; Secondly, define the parameters of the debate; thirdly, ask residents in the form of a questionnaire to get the answer they want - green bin suspension being a case in point. European Commission guidance states: “considering that the aim of separate collection is high quality recycling, the introduction of a separate collection system is not necessary if the aim of high quality recycling can be achieved just as well with a form of co-mingled collection.” There are a number of Companies who are able to deal effectively with "co-mingled collection" and it is hoped that CE will listen to all parties in the debate.
Kate Ravenscroft
Thursday 8th January 2015 at 4:19 pm
Jackie - I don't have much faith in CE either, we will have to watch and I guess. Their hands are tied to a degree but let's hope they find a solution that works for as many people as possible - include the residents of the area.
I do know however that up to 10% of dry recyclables currently goes to waste after sorting from co-mingled collections, that's a lot of valuable, reusable material.
Some waste management companies can indeed deal effectively with co-mingled waste but the quality of the output will never be as good, and therefore as reusable/valuable, as material collected separately.
Pete Taylor
Monday 12th January 2015 at 12:37 pm
At the time when CEC introduced the excellent three bin scheme, they told us how much it was going to save, it would be a shame if this now has to be "un-saved"!

At the rate of £650k per year it would take nearly four years to add up to the amount wasted on Lyme Green.