Lorry gets stuck under railway bridge

Station Road had to be closed this afternoon as a lorry has struck the railway bridge.

The incident happened around 1pm when a lorry travelling north on Alderley Road turned right into Station Road, damaging the railings and losing a wheel arch as it did so. The driver did not stop but proceeded down Station Road where it was too high to clear the railway bridge and was stopped by the steel protector.

The road was closed by the police while the recovery was in progress. The lorry was cleared at 3.05pm and a police spokesperson confirmed the driver was not arrested.

Matt Walker, age 17, who witnessed the incident told wilmslow.co.uk "I was walking up and saw a lorry crash into three fences, then saw and heard the lorry crash into the bridge under the train lines.

"The train were cancelled. The man was not from this country but maybe tired from what the police were saying. The fences were near the Bolin Fee in Wilmslow. Cheshire police were at the crash five minues later."

Ryan Cooper was also at the scene. He said "I was walking to the train station and saw the back of a lorry go into the air and a massive crash and not something that you see every day but the lorry was then stuck under the bridge."

Trains were stopped as a result of the incident but started operating shortly afterwards.

Cllr Rod Menlove said "This was a totally avoidable accident that appears to be a result of bad driving. The railings will need to be replaced and I have already contacted Highways to press that the cost is charged to the haulage company insurance. The condition of the bridge is a matter for Network Rail."

Tags:
Station Road
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Jamie Ross
Saturday 26th July 2014 at 9:55 am
Just reading Cllr Rod Menlove's comments...."this was a totally avoidable accident that appears to be the result of bad driving". Firstly Mr Menlove, as a councillor im sure you should be aware that an accident is now deemed an incident that no one has caused or reason to be blamed for. So if you call it an accident, then he is not to blame. Secondly, im going to assume that you were not there when it happened....so what gives you the right to judge and assume its bad driving? Do you think this lorry driver enjoys bridge bashing and causing trouble to the roads, the railways and his employer and more so his driving licence? The fact is that an incident happend and you jumped to conclusions....and your only concern amazingly was the railings that got damaged, even your concern for the bridge condition stops at "thats Network Rails issue". Do you think that when the driver (from a big company) who drove off a motorway bridge on the M56 a couple of years ago, was a bad driver? He had health issues and died as a result!! It does not matter where the driver originated from! Lorry drivers are doing a job that in many aspects you personally will benefit from, who delivers your groceries to the supermarket you at????...what matters is that no one was killed or injured and no long term damage has been done. If the driver has made a mistake then VOSA will be dealing with it. Im not going to comment on what happened as i was not there and i dont know the facts....but my rant over!!
Jon Williams
Saturday 26th July 2014 at 11:48 am
Well said Jamie - We must not jump to conclusions without knowing the full facts.
Vince Chadwick
Saturday 26th July 2014 at 9:38 pm
Well yes, but really... the circumstances of this incident (not accident) don't reflect well on this driver. He must (should!!) have been aware of his failure to make the turn into Station Road safely, and the damage he did there, yet he drove on. That was either a result of unawareness or worse.

Then to drive his truck under a too-low bridge immediately afterwards is not an indicator of competence.

The railways suffer many, many bridge strikes each year by HGV drivers. They can cause major rail delays as the trains have to be halted until a civil engineer has declared the bridge safe to carry trains, or worse, imposed speed limits or closure pending repairs. The rail passengers so inconvenienced sure as heck will be blaming the railway, not the cowboy who drove his tuck into the bridge.

This driver in his incompetence only damaged property in this instance. Think how much worse it could have been had there been pedestrians waiting for the pedestrian lights to go 'green' to cross the road on that central reservation.

Councillor Menlove's comments are entirely justified, except he called it an accident, which it wasn't.
Mark Goldsmith
Sunday 27th July 2014 at 9:08 am
I don't think you have to be Sherlock Holmes to work out who was at fault on this one. What are the chances of the bridge being the guilty party? I know Hartlepool once tried a monkey, but Wilmslow putting a bridge in the dock for careless driving would be a first.

I also presume the driver didn't do it deliberately as some sort of botched al Qaeda plan, so the use of the term accident seems entirely appropriate.

If we now have to use some public sector inspired phrase that replaces the perfectly good word "Accident", well it just shows some of them still have too much time on their hands and there is more waste left to be cut. Thankfully Cllr Menlove doesn't seem to have had that memo yet so thankfully remains blissfully free to comment on the 'bleedin obvious'
DELETED ACCOUNT
Sunday 27th July 2014 at 2:00 pm
Sorry but I am with Jamie on this one. We do not know what happened. We do not know whether, for instance, there was a mechanical failure either in turning or to the breaks or both. I am amazed at the skill of lorry drivers generally and I will not jump to conclusions in advance of appropriate investigations being made.
Vince Chadwick
Sunday 27th July 2014 at 8:12 pm
Jackie, anythings possible. But really! Was that a squadron of pigs I just saw flying over Wilmslow! ;-)
Jamie Ross
Monday 28th July 2014 at 3:54 pm
Just going back to my point people.... i never said that the driver didnt cause the collision. Clearly he did.... my point was that Cllr Menlove straight away blamed bad driving! As i refered to the lorry driver who died after dropping from a bridge on the M56.... he had a heart issue.... but still crashed his lorry. Was he a bad driver?? I rest my case!